Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

UK Parliament research briefing on Transgender athletes

12 replies

MrsJamin · 11/10/2022 12:15

A POSTnote giving an overview of the scientific and stakeholder debate on policies regulating the participation of transgender athletes in elite, professional sports. - you can download the PDF from here.

Overview:

  • Male athletes have a sport performance advantage over female athletes.
  • Sport is separated into sex categories to ensure competitive fairness and in some sports, on athlete safety grounds.
  • Research suggests that the physical advantage from going through a male puberty is not fully removed in transgender women who undergo treatment to suppress testosterone levels.
  • Sports governing bodies are adopting different approaches. Some impose eligibility restrictions; others seek to widen participation, such as via open categories.
  • Some stakeholders regard restrictions on eligibility as discriminatory while others view them as necessary to ensure fairness or safety.

This seems pretty clear - I can imagine many of the 'reviewers' of this research will be livid e.g. Mermaids, Gendered Intelligence, Blair Hamilton, Sam Winemiller, LEAP Sports Scotland, and Stonewall.

OP posts:
JustWaking · 11/10/2022 12:27

"Some transgender people transition to change their gender presentation"

This is such a clear way to put it!

SunflowerDuck · 11/10/2022 12:28

Wow excellent.

Imnobody4 · 11/10/2022 12:40

This seems fairly unbiased on first reading.
I notice Mermaids was one of the reviewers!

AmaryllisNightAndDay · 11/10/2022 12:41

One thing it doesn't discuss, is the health effects on athletes themselves. Can it be healthy for "transgender athletes" to mess with their hormone levels so as to qualify to compete in elite sports as the "right" gender? The pressure to do so must be enormous.

KatMcBundleFace · 11/10/2022 13:25

"Transgender people have a gender identity that differs from their sex registered at birth."

Not "assigned"

KatMcBundleFace · 11/10/2022 13:28

Lots of "women who are not transgender"
I'm grateful for the lack of cis, but really you can just describe us as women. There's really only one type, and they are female.

KatMcBundleFace · 11/10/2022 13:34

The reviewers list seems balanced.

Plenty of trans activists there but also fair play for women, world rugby, Jon Pike etc.

Didn't see Emma Hilton though? Is she with an organisation?

MrsJamin · 11/10/2022 16:29

Jon Pike replied to someone on twitter about why Mermaids were on the reviewers list, his answer is interesting:
Some details on this: 1) the contribution and discussion all happened before the current serious concerns about Mermaids came to light.
2) Whilst I think Mermaids have precisely nothing to offer to the discussion, since they are not experts in this area, I think it was important that the consultation should be seen to consult with everyone who might be seen as stakeholders. I don't think they made any material difference to the report.

Love that he got the 'not experts' line in🤣

OP posts:
Igmum · 11/10/2022 19:11

Great tweets and this is excellent news. This is what should have been happening all along. Lobby groups can lobby in freedom but official briefings should be balanced, evidence based and public. Having the narrative controlled by lobbyists is bad for all of us.

MrsJamin · 11/10/2022 19:25

I love now that we have something balanced to point to, any grass roots or larger sport can refer to this for their policy now.

OP posts:
PaleBlueMoonlight · 11/10/2022 19:45

Does it also cover the social disparity between men/boys and women/girls in terms of access to sporting opportunities? Also the different implications of each reproductive system on the ability to train/have children while also engaging in sport?

(sorry, I know I could read it to find out)

VestofAbsurdity · 11/10/2022 20:18

Overall a reasonably balanced report.

The Sports Councils guidance was welcomed by Women in Sport, who supported the recommendation of creating well evidenced inclusion policies.

The campaign groups Sex Matters and Fair Play For Women, commended the focus on safety and fairness but were disappointed that the guidance did not restrict transgender athletes from competing in the sex category of their choice.

Still some issues.

The transgender youth charity Mermaids argued that the guidance misinterpreted the Equality Act 2010 and ignored lived experiences of trans people.

No surprises there considering they don't understand the Equality Act 2010 and frequently trot out inaccuracies about it.

The LGBTIQ+ Sport & Physical Activity Alliance criticised the guidance for presenting “a false dichotomy of inclusion and fairness”, and stated that the guidance will impact negatively on inclusion of transgender people in sport.

No surprises here either they have failed in their mission to completely decimate female sports and give not one shiny shit for women and girls.

This issue is set in the context of wider societal debate surrounding equality for transgender people. A range of similar views from LGBT+ organisations have been shared following recent publication of IFs’ regulations. They describe regulations as discriminatory, in contravention of the IOC framework and human rights, lacking evidence, and lacking compassion for transgender athletes, which could result in psychological harm.

No concern for the human rights of women of course, nor any compassion for women and the psychological (and physical) harm caused to them.

There are concerns that the age 12 cut-off in swimming is arbitrary, because the age of puberty varies, transitioning is restricted to older ages, and access to NHS gender identity services is constrained.

Hmm.

Some proponents of restricting participation in the female category have concerns that loss of fair competition could result in loss of rankings and funding opportunities for women, resulting in decreased participation in sport. Further concern was raised that allowing anyone to self-identify into the
female category could compromise both fairness and physical safety in some sports

Precisely.

New posts on this thread. Refresh page