Apologies if there is already a thread on this. I couldn't see one. New academic article by Professor Michael Biggs of the University of Oxford. Open access, so you should be able to read the entire text using the link below.
It's jawdropping stuff. I am not an academic or an HCP, but I could follow the gist of it. To my amateur eyes the case for giving children and teenagers puberty blockers and then cross-sex hormones and 'gender affirming' surgery (i.e. double mastectomy for girls, followed by hysterectomy and removal of ovaries, removal of testicles and surgery on penis for boys) is based on appallingly flimsy evidence. Who has been advocating for the children in all of this? Why haven't HCPs and scientists, not to mention politicians and social worker, been looking at this and saying 'No'?
www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/0092623X.2022.2121238
The Dutch Protocol for Juvenile Transsexuals: Origins and Evidence
Michael Biggs
Published online: 19 Sep 2022