The final version of SOC8 is out and amongst other things, the chapter on eunuchs has been retained (chapter 9). Surely the NHS must completely distance themselves from WPATH (particularly looking at you, NHS Scotland)
www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/26895269.2022.2100644
Susie Green and Mermaids are cited. Funny that Mermaids said the Cass Review was not their field just this week in court, but WPATH would appear to be.
Questioning parents are treated with great suspicion, including (when referring to hormones and surgery for adolescents):
“Helping youth and parent(s)/caregiver(s) work together on important gender care decisions is a primary goal. However, in some cases, parent(s)/ caregiver(s) may be too rejecting of their adoles- cent child and their child’s gender needs to be part of the clinical evaluation process. In these situations, youth may require the engagement of larger systems of advocacy and support to move
forward with the necessary support and care (Dubin et al., 2020).”
(S58)
The minimum ages for treatment have been removed, but I’m not convinced that’s much better as will allow providers room to lower and lower the age for the medical pathway.