No, that's not what she's doing. She’s specifically refusing to support revision of the EHRC Statutory Code of Practice that provides clarity around the conditions for single sex spaces.
Why would she do that? That's just two faced, and makes her as mendacious as Penny Mordaunt.
In 2019, the Woman’s and Equalities Committee urged the EHRC to issue a new code setting out "clearly, with worked examples and guidance, (a) how the Act allows separate services for men and women, or provision of services to only men or only women in certain circumstances, and (b) how and under what circumstances it allows those providing such services to choose how and if to provide them to a person who has the protected characteristic of gender reassignment."
And when they finally do that, and try to ensure that the relevance of biological sex is clarified in in the EHRC statutory code, up pops Lizz Truss to deliberately fudge the matter:
“The Government has no interest in changing the current situation where transgender people are able to use facilities of their chosen gender”.
The law says different, so why is she misrepresenting the law? Why didn't she support EHRC in laying the revised code before Parliament? And instead choose to prop up TRA deliberate misinterpretations, which undermine women's safety?