Meet the Other Phone. A phone that grows with your child.

Meet the Other Phone.
A phone that grows with your child.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

People with the capacity for pregnancy... would that be, women?

68 replies

PaddleBoardingMomma · 12/07/2022 19:12

https://twitter.com/gregprice11/status/1546891926997188608?s=24&t=XMXJzvWWonOzM4sYUG56g

I mean... what can you say 👀

OP posts:
AryaStarkWolf · 13/07/2022 14:32

Flopisfatteningbingforchristmas · 12/07/2022 19:16

What about women who are post menopausal?

They've never had any issue with the word woman being used before and I don't think they have now either!

DdraigGoch · 13/07/2022 15:17

Doona · 13/07/2022 01:00

Hawley was being combative and disingenuous. People with the capacity for pregnancy is an awkward phrase, yes, but possibly more accurate than women in the current circumstances. Maybe such accuracy is necessary in a legal setting. Yes, she didn't handle it well politically, perhaps, but she's not a PR person or a politician. She's a legal professor. I feel sad that here on a feminist website people are cheering on the powerful, sneering man who set her up.

Repeating "people with the capacity to become pregnant" several times is very clunky when there is a simple word "women". Women who are infertile for one reason or another know that these arguments aren't referring to them, there's no need to clarify.

If transmen are men, why would they end up pregnant?

nepeta · 13/07/2022 16:26

OfficerArrestThatRuffian · 13/07/2022 09:47

Genuinely, here's what I think it takes away from you: the ability to draw a clear line and analyse the connection between the class of people who were denied the vote, who were denied equal education, career opportunities and economic independence, who could not obtain a mortgage in their own right even if they managed to scrabble some of those things to themselves, who were defined as chattels of men, whom it was legal to rape within marriage until the 1980s in the UK (etc. etc. etc.) and the people now being denied abortions.

All of those things were done to women because they are women and all of that history and those societal attitudes were visited on women because they are women. It is desperately important context for what is currently being done around abortion rights in order to analyse and understand the reasons this is happening and what it has led to before. Abortion rights are under attack as much because they affect women as a class (regardless of whether or not all women can become pregnant) as any other consideration, and traditionally it has been fine to outrageously disadvantage women without any second thought, particularly if it serves men, and that attitude remains very relevant and insidiously pervasive.

An analogy to my mind is acknowledging that the Holocaust was genocide of Jews but then suggesting that the Labour party recently had a problem with "people who smash glasses under foot at weddings, people who wear a kippah and people who are circumcised". I mean...sort of correct as far as it goes, I suppose, but it misses out a lot of the class and includes some people in it who shouldn't be in it and makes it fucking difficult to be able to conduct a class analysis and clearly state that what we're dealing with is exactly the same old prejudice - against exactly the same class of people - that's been kicking around for hundreds or thousands of years.

It's the same problem for many of the same reasons and we need to be able to clearly articulate that if we have any hope of solving the ever-recurring issue.

I strongly agree with this post which states the fundamental problem very clearly. Women and girls have always been oppressed on the basis of their sex. When we remove the names for our sex class, we make the continuity of sexism and misogyny and the way they pick their targets invisible.

We make fighting for women's rights much harder, if not almost impossible, too.

And the new euphemisms and the forced redefinition of 'woman' also take away the way most of us actually define our own womanhood. We are asked to be women on some other, novel, ground, but nobody is willing to even give us a definition that wouldn't be subjective, unfalsifiable belief in a gendered soul, not that different from a religious belief. And if we refuse to worship at that church, we are called bigots and worse.

Delphinium20 · 13/07/2022 16:32

I'm so angry that the left is putting up women like this to fight for women's abortion rights. She had a golden opportunity to say, "Yes, Senator Hawley, this IS a woman's rights issue and you are denying women the right to full bodily autonomy by denying them the right to an abortion."

Instead, she took the bait, pivoted, and now is a gift to the GOP come whatever next election could be tight.

nepeta · 13/07/2022 16:35

@DdraigGoch

If transmen are men, why would they end up pregnant?

This is a very important question, for reasons of the deep theory behind the gender identity ideology, though it is always answered by veering away from the question and by asking why they shouldn't have the right to get pregnant.

The answer from their deep theory is that they have redefined 'woman' so that it is nothing but sexist stereotypes and assumed comfort with the gender norms and roles a culture assigns people of the female sex.

And those are the things many trans men seem to want to avoid by transitioning (though some may also have body dysmorphia). I have seen pretty open statements by some of them to that effect.

Why this is a problem for our side is pretty obvious as we have all now been redefined as the gender which is passive, submissive, emotional, and nurturing (from the definition of femininity).

So those who use inclusive language for the sake of trans men, say, also buy into the idea that 'women and girls' now has no basis in biological sex, but is a concept which refers to people whose gender identities are close to the Barbie Doll end of the old Mermaid's graph about how to find your gender identity.

peonyred · 13/07/2022 16:39

I think I would prefer "women and...." why should the word "woman" be excluded. That way everyone feels included.

TheWeeDonkey · 13/07/2022 16:41

Indeed, the answer is women.

My theory there is a large section of society that will be forever resentful about it and that is why they find so many ways to punish us for it.

Delphinium20 · 13/07/2022 16:47

Honest to goddess, I'm so angry right now...if the topic is women's reproductive autonomy, I want the trans activists to shut the fuck up and go away. This is about ABORTION and we ALL KNOW WHO THAT AFFECTS.Talking about transphobia during a critical juncture in American politics and women's rights is an extraordinary waste of oxygen and the worst kind of distraction. We can't even build a women's movement right now due to the word police and regular people's fear over this massively obnoxious, and minuscule, topic.

US women started a movement with the Women's March, it went global, and then that capitulated. It was grassroots and glorious for a hot minute. US women don't even have a visible, well-known leader like we did in the past (we have no 21st century Gloria Steinem, no Shirley Chisholm, no Bella Abzug). Kamala Harris is now eerily milquetoast despite a few years ago she made that famous line during the Kavanaugh hearing, “Can you think of any laws that give government the power to make decisions about the male body?”

UK women have JKR, Julie Bindel, Helen Joyce and even controversial Posie Parker. I swear I'm jealous and pissed at the same time that when we need a woman to stand up and fight for us, we end up with this idiotic, earnestly sanctimonious Berkeley professor.

My only hope is Amy KIobuchar who keeps talking about a woman's right to abortion.

nepeta · 13/07/2022 16:48

This is the YouTube bit about the exchange

She employs the familiar technique (if you have seen one of these exchanges on Twitter you have seen them all) of arguing that asking about the definition of 'women' is transphobic, and that this will immediately cause transgender people to die by suicide. But she does give a new figure related to suicide here (new to me): that one in five transgender people have attempted suicide.

So the only way we can prevent transgender suicides is by completely stopping all debates about the competing demands for rights? That means we already know which set of demands will win.

TheWeeDonkey · 13/07/2022 16:57

OfficerArrestThatRuffian · 13/07/2022 09:47

Genuinely, here's what I think it takes away from you: the ability to draw a clear line and analyse the connection between the class of people who were denied the vote, who were denied equal education, career opportunities and economic independence, who could not obtain a mortgage in their own right even if they managed to scrabble some of those things to themselves, who were defined as chattels of men, whom it was legal to rape within marriage until the 1980s in the UK (etc. etc. etc.) and the people now being denied abortions.

All of those things were done to women because they are women and all of that history and those societal attitudes were visited on women because they are women. It is desperately important context for what is currently being done around abortion rights in order to analyse and understand the reasons this is happening and what it has led to before. Abortion rights are under attack as much because they affect women as a class (regardless of whether or not all women can become pregnant) as any other consideration, and traditionally it has been fine to outrageously disadvantage women without any second thought, particularly if it serves men, and that attitude remains very relevant and insidiously pervasive.

An analogy to my mind is acknowledging that the Holocaust was genocide of Jews but then suggesting that the Labour party recently had a problem with "people who smash glasses under foot at weddings, people who wear a kippah and people who are circumcised". I mean...sort of correct as far as it goes, I suppose, but it misses out a lot of the class and includes some people in it who shouldn't be in it and makes it fucking difficult to be able to conduct a class analysis and clearly state that what we're dealing with is exactly the same old prejudice - against exactly the same class of people - that's been kicking around for hundreds or thousands of years.

It's the same problem for many of the same reasons and we need to be able to clearly articulate that if we have any hope of solving the ever-recurring issue.

This is a brilliant post.

It's easy to forget how hard women fought for our rights and how easy it is to lose them. You only have to look at the middle East, Poland, Ireland and some South American countries to see how easy it is for women to lose our liberty and security.

We need to name what we are fighting for it we have a chance to protect ourselves.

Delphinium20 · 13/07/2022 17:26

As to the suicide topic, there is a class of US women who have the highest rates of suicide (for women) in the country - Native American women. This is documented in our CDC, Centers for Disease Control. Sadly, those numbers have remained shockingly high for many years. Higher numbers of Native American women live in states with abortion bans like North and South Dakota, Nebraska, Texas, Wyoming, Utah, Idaho, Arizona and Oklahoma. Native American women's pay gap is the worst in the nation (tied in some measures w/ Black American women). Though Native American women make up just 0.3% of the overall workforce, they made up 0.5% of the front-line workers during the pandemic.

Native American women face the highest rates of sexual assault in the United States — in fact, 56.1% of Native American women have experienced sexual violence in their lifetimes, and Native Americans are twice as likely to experience sexual assault compared to other races.

If we're going to talk about suicide and abortion, spokespeople should make it count for the women who's lives are the most by these issues.

Delphinium20 · 13/07/2022 17:27

TheWeeDonkey · 13/07/2022 16:57

This is a brilliant post.

It's easy to forget how hard women fought for our rights and how easy it is to lose them. You only have to look at the middle East, Poland, Ireland and some South American countries to see how easy it is for women to lose our liberty and security.

We need to name what we are fighting for it we have a chance to protect ourselves.

agreed @OfficerArrestThatRuffian that is a brilliant analogy.

MangyInseam · 13/07/2022 18:15

KatVonlabonk · 12/07/2022 23:28

When are these fools going to realise what a gift they are to the right?

I wonder if they will.

I saw some of the Rubin Report about this whole exchange. It was fairly long so I only watched part of it, but he was pretty scathing, both about her attitude to women, to being challenged, and her direct refusal to ask the question does an 8 month fetus had value.

My thought was similar to yours, with people like this no wonder people like Rubin are fleeing progressive politics.

But given the way progressives, especially in the US, simply refuse to engage at all with conservative or right media - even moderate stuff, maybe they will never see it? They watch tiny clips to ridicule, but usually have a very warped view of what the actual responses of conservative voters are, they tend to reduce it to racism or transphobia and don't connect it at all with what is happening on the left.

MangyInseam · 13/07/2022 18:26

GCMM · 13/07/2022 11:29

In a way she was ‘set up’ by the questioner and boy, did she walk into the trap! Everyone who is remotely interested in sex and gender issues, as she obviously is, knows that these questions are routinely being posed to politicians and other public figures. She should have been prepared to be questioned on her choice of words. Then all she needed to have said was something along the lines of
‘I prefer to use that wording, because a small minority of those who can get pregnant don’t identify as women and I respect that’. But no, she leapt straight to accusations of transphobia, using spurious suicide figures, accusations that he was denying that trans people exist, mocking him for not believing that men can get pregnant – in doing so, she made herself (and by implication her university) look stupid.

Yeah, that was interesting. He was going for the angle that she could hardly talk about discrimination being against women if pregnancy isn't about being a woman. I'm not sure if he was trying to provoke her to go all cracker-pots, but it certainly made her look like a person with an agenda rather than an argument.

Clymene · 13/07/2022 18:30

That woman needs to watch the brilliant Aja's poem about racism and trans ideology: twitter.com/ecuadorianmum/status/1547089511280267264?s=21&t=-n-wFb9BXBWQz5mIiUs8qQ

ZombieMumEB · 14/07/2022 04:58

GoodJanetBadJanet · 13/07/2022 01:15

Trans men can get pregnant too.
You may not want to acknowledge them, say they're still women, that's why they can get pregnant but the thing is they are legally recognized as men and can still get pregnant.
They have a duty of care too.
It takes nothing away from me to recognise this. I can still get health care for my needs too.
People seem to be (on purpose, who knows?) misreading what it actually means.

It takes nothing away from me to recognise this. I can still get health care for my needs too.

For the moment - you might think it takes nothing away from you. Long term - this is creating a dangerous territory for women.

The word "woman" is now becoming taboo, unless it's referring to a male, then it's ok.

The words "women" and "mother" are being removed and replaced with terms that describe bodily function. The same is not happening for men. Why?

It won't be too long before females lose all rights they have had to fight hard to get, and in a blink of an eye we'll all just become sex slaves ("sex work is work"), and baby gestational vessels.

Soon we won't be able to work, have an education, to have a bank account in our name, and have control over lives. We are going to be rounded up and treated like cattle thanks to people like @GoodJanetBadJanet, who happily gave away the rights of all females.

It may not mean much to @GoodJanetBadJanet, and that's because @GoodJanetBadJanet is blind to what's actually going on.

334bu · 14/07/2022 07:51

The sad thing is that many on Twitter believe this woman bested her opponent, instead of allowing him to divert things away from the very important topic of woman's right to bodily autonomy.

Boxowine · 14/07/2022 22:47

DdraigGoch · 13/07/2022 15:17

Repeating "people with the capacity to become pregnant" several times is very clunky when there is a simple word "women". Women who are infertile for one reason or another know that these arguments aren't referring to them, there's no need to clarify.

If transmen are men, why would they end up pregnant?

Well, they do get raped too. Or, like many other adult human females in the US, they may not have access to birth control. Either due to partner abusive control or lack of family planning centers or a pharmacist who refused to fill their prescription, or maybe ignorance due to lack of sex education where they went to school. Maybe they got bad medical advice re: fertility and medical transitioning.

Maybe they work for Hobby Lobby. Senator Hawley was co counsel for that firm's Supreme Court case fighting against a mandate to include birth control coverage in the health insurance policies offered to their employees. Because it's an abortifacient.

It would be nice if people talked about Hawley doing that instead of this scripted interaction.

New posts on this thread. Refresh page
Swipe left for the next trending thread