top-academic-behind-fetish-site-hosting-child-sexual-abuse-fantasy-push-to-revise-wpath-guidelines

[Popuptent]

reduxx.info/top-academic-behind-fetish-site-hosting-child-sexual-abuse-fantasy-push-to-revise-wpath-guidelines/

So... When prominent women, and others, said that there were some highly influential men working to get the medical definition of transgender, dysphoria changed, the trans umbrella widened, they were ridiculed, hounded, vilified.

And now there is absolute evidence will WPATH and the DSM be revised? Surely everything these men have been involved with, all of their input, evidence etc, is now truly tainted?

Surely this will be done publicly, to reassure everyone that the obvious damage is being undone!

So grim. I can't quite articulate my thoughts on this subject, but the way perverted, abusive men continue to be protected by this thin veneer of respectability is really shameful.

It needs highlighting but I wish I hadn't read that.

So grim.

The End Game what some of us women suspected . I would love to think this was the unravelling of this, but not sure it is. Men always get what they want sadly.

I agree. Sadly I suspect this could be shouted from every rooftop band most would shrug their shoulders and bugger all would change.

It's not even plausible deniability. It's just so what, who cares?

It's disturbing and distressing in equal measure.

When Genevieve Gluck was discussing her investigations with Glinner, she had some interesting speculations as to why there is a concerted effort to disdain and attack the viewpoint of lesbians and feminists. Gluck argues that previous attempts (1970s to 1990s) to normalise various paraphilia and to remove the age of consent by forced teaming these campaigns with gay rights etc. were successfully halted by actions from women, feminists, and particularly lesbians who spoke up about their concerns, especially around safeguarding.

There seems to be a recrudescence of concerted action to normalise these ambitions again. Gluck comments on the strategy of the pre-emptive attack on feminists and lesbian by ostracising them and "slandering them as TERFs from the start": the segment lasts for about 2 mins from this point.

Surely, surely anyone important discovering that WPATH guidelines were rewritten by serious sadists would insist on returning to the prior versions.

Also, what is happening in academia were there are multiple professors apparently making a living off apologia for sadists who fantasise about child abuse?