Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

First trans peer a step closer as hereditary candidate claims seat

109 replies

ChristinaXYZ · 20/05/2022 22:31

Interesting article in the Telegraph

www.telegraph.co.uk/politics/2022/05/20/first-trans-peer-step-closer-hereditary-candidate-claims-seat/

"Matilda Simon will contest the next by-election for one of the upper chamber’s 92 hereditary seats...

"...The House of Lords could shortly welcome its first trans peer and only female hereditary member.

Matilda Simon was this week given permission to contest the next by-election for one of the upper chamber’s remaining 92 hereditary seats.

If she wins, she will doubtless become the envy of peers’ daughters across the country, because the vast majority of titles may only be passed to a male heir.

However, because of a legal loophole, the candidate, born Matthew Simon in 1955, has inherited and retains the Barony of Wythenshawe, despite being in all other legal respects a woman...

"...Lady Simon winning a future by-election - which will take place upon the death or retirement of a hereditary member - would be likely to reignite the debate over the persistence of primogeniture among the aristocracy.

In 2013, in the aftermath of the marriage of the Duke and Duchess of Cambridge, Parliament passed a law to allow a first born child to inherit the throne, but this principle only applies to the Royal Family, not the peerage.

In recent years, Lord Balfour spoke of his anger that his Earldom would pass to his younger brother upon his death, rather than any of his daughters.
Indeed, he joked that a cunning ruse to ensure one of them succeeds would be if they transitioned to become a man.
However, according to a source close to the current process, that would not work, as the case of Lady Simon proves....

"...And in what the source close to the process described as an “irony”, she [Matilda Simon] has a sister born two years earlier.

“If the title had been inheritable by a woman, it would have gone to Margaret, the older sister, rather than the younger sister,” he said..."

Read the full article on the Telegraph website.

OP posts:
ResisterRex · 23/05/2022 13:16

This is fascinating. It's like the single sex exemptions but in another sphere of life. Our class system might be the one thing that has stopped us from going Full Canada on this issue.

Lovelyricepudding · 23/05/2022 15:33

Whilst it is outrageous that this individual want his cake and eat it, in this case I would say the bigger outrage is the fact that a portion of government explicitly excludes women.

TheBiologyStupid · 23/05/2022 17:08

MagnoliaTaint · 23/05/2022 12:40

if contested, hereditary titles are done on DNA

Well, that is interesting.

That sounds suspiciously modern for the hereditaries.

Metabigot · 23/05/2022 17:59

QuitMitheringMe · 20/05/2022 22:50

The GRA has a specific exemption for peerages

Cannot fund any suitable words for this.

Remember who signs off these laws ....

Artichokeleaves · 23/05/2022 19:34

Isn't it funny how it's always a straight forward sex based, heads male people win and tails female people lose?

However, from what I've read about the lobbying process that led up to the GRA, the activists who'd been pushing for something like this for a while never intended to stop there.

It would at this point be ridiculously and stupidly naive to believe that the current goals are intended to stop there either. Every inch is just the thin end of the wedge, it has been proved over and over again.

Repeal the bloody GRA. It was a badly made and very stupid law, that has caused absolute bloody havoc, has successfully harmed women's rights and equalities to a really staggering and unprecedented degree in decades, and has the potential to cause way more harm than this.

Mxyzptlk · 23/05/2022 22:28

Repeal the bloody GRA. It was a badly made and very stupid law, that has caused absolute bloody havoc, has successfully harmed women's rights and equalities to a really staggering and unprecedented degree in decades, and has the potential to cause way more harm than this.

Exactly.

MagnoliaTaint · 23/05/2022 22:30

Mxyzptlk · 23/05/2022 22:28

Repeal the bloody GRA. It was a badly made and very stupid law, that has caused absolute bloody havoc, has successfully harmed women's rights and equalities to a really staggering and unprecedented degree in decades, and has the potential to cause way more harm than this.

Exactly.

Yep.

PubBore · 25/05/2022 14:43

as modern as they need to be to avoid daughters getting their hands on what belongs to the boys!

New posts on this thread. Refresh page