This is pretty good, but I see they're accepting the term "assigned male at birth" with the implication that it's something arbitrary, so the same person could equally well have been called female. Of course the TRAs love this! I wish the organisation would say that a person's sex was "acquired at conception" instead. Or make a reference to XX versus XY chromosomes, possibly with some acknowledgement that there are a few individuals who have variant conditions.
But they end up drawing the right conclusions, which is the most important thing.