@Abitofalark its an interesting point you make and while I agree with the principle, I actually think giving examples are precisely what is needed to show how outrageously indefensible the TWAW stance is. It is only within the last year to 18 months that I have seen the light on all this I’m fairly liberal and the trans rights movements seemed like an extension of the gay rights movement. The penny only dropped when the implications of TWAW were made clear by reference to specific examples.
It is easy in the abstract to offer platitudes about trans people deserving dignity and respect (and I agree with that - in principle), but when you give concrete examples (womens prison’s, rape crisis centres, school changing rooms etc etc etc) it is much more difficult to offer any credible defence.
Perhaps I should have mentioned that the candidate with whom I was corresponding is a woman…! (Not that it should make a difference I suppose but it’s interesting context).
@SamphirethePogoingStickerist as to your final query about whether she was held down and made to type some of her nonsense, it does indeed appear that she has been given some third party input - I can tell from the fact her reply contains different fonts. But who know what she meant by “intrusive checks”.
However, I can only assume that she would have no issue with her 13 year old daughter sharing a changing facility with, eg transgender Jamie Wallis MP and him exposing his female penis and testicles to her (JW still presenting as a man having said he still prefers to use male pronouns).
But in her world we cannot even ask someone who appears to be male if they are a transwoman, meaning she must also be happy for any and all men to use the women’s changing room and expose themselves to her daughter, regardless of their motivations for doing so. 🙄