Let's be honest, when you say 'pregnant person' or 'person with a cervix' you are in fact saying 'I put male people first and don't wish to upset them in referring to females'.
But yes. In a lot of the commentary in the papers this past week there have been many statements from activists and journalists about 'humans' and 'people' when they definitely do not mean females.
Statements like 'there are people with real suffering under this issue' for example is absolutely not said to recognise that female people excluded from resources is a problem, it means some male people may find it difficult that some spaces specifically to ensure female needs are met are not open to them. 'People' simply means male.
But we've said from the start, women have been fighting for bloody centuries that males are the default human. This is in so very many ways a male supremacist agenda. The question is just how intentionally and consciously, and whether there is any sense of conscience when it is pointed out. And the awful irony that many pushing this agenda call themselves 'feminists'.