Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Washington Post erases women

9 replies

frazzled1 · 01/04/2022 17:04

www.washingtonpost.com/health/2022/03/31/pregnancy-covid-risk/

Washington Post does not once name pregnant WOMEN as being at higher risk of breakthrough Covid.

Pregnant people at much higher risk of breakthrough covid, study shows

Pregnant people who are vaccinated against the coronavirus are nearly twice as likely to get covid-19 as those who are not pregnant

The analysis, based on medical records of nearly 14 million U.S. patients since coronavirus immunization became available, found that pregnant people who are vaccinated have the greatest risk of developing covid among a dozen medical states, including being an organ transplant recipient and having cancer.

The findings come on top of research showing that people who are pregnant or gave birth recently and became infected are especially prone to getting seriously ill from covid-19. And covid has been found to increase the risk of pregnancy complications, such as premature births.

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has been urging people to get coronavirus shots before or during pregnancy, seeking to dispel fear — widespread in some communities, without scientific basis — that those vaccinations could be harmful. As of March, nearly 70 percent of people who were pregnant had been vaccinated before or during their pregnancy, according to federal data, though disparities persist among racial and ethnic groups.

The new study goes beyond what has previously been understood, suggesting that even pregnant people who are fully vaccinated tend to have less protection from the virus than many other patients with significant medical problems.

And on and on it goes. Not one mention of pregnant woman/women. FFS.

Needless to say physician David R. Little gets a 'he'.

Angry
OP posts:
Ereshkigalangcleg · 01/04/2022 17:05

Hopefully that will peak some more women.

Ereshkigalangcleg · 01/04/2022 17:10

Some good comments!

Abhannmor · 01/04/2022 18:34

Wtaf would Woodward and Bernstein make of this garbage I wonder. There again they live in the belly of the beast...

Circumferences · 01/04/2022 18:46

Write to the editor and complain.

It's offensive to women to erase us in this way.

The entire population of humans on earth came out of either a woman or a woman-who-identifies-as-a-man.

Pregnancy only affects women.
I'm sure they can do better.

334bu · 01/04/2022 18:54

Comments are really heartening as these are WaPo readers and should be Liberal leaning. Looks as if the Democrats are making a rod for their own backs

Delphinium20 · 01/04/2022 19:35

Comments are overwhelmingly on women's side. And subscribers trend left of center.

Fun fact: My local paper picked up this article but changed the headline to "Pregnant Women." And I live in a pretty woke area. Proud they didn't capitulate.

Delphinium20 · 01/04/2022 19:37

Here's a good sample comment that reflects the overall mood of the thousands of pissed off readers:

The Washington Post has committed to erasing women, full stop.
WOMEN get pregnant. Reproductive choice is a WOMEN'S issue;
If men got pregnant, we wouldn't be having a national fistfight over who owns our bodies. Say it: WOMEN.

BootsAndRoots · 01/04/2022 19:46

Again when it comes to medical issues biological sex is very important.

There is a belief that covid is made worse by testosterone (or immunity is improved with oestrogen). It could be due to male lifestyle or typical male jobs, it's hard to know but I believe that sex does have a part to play, or at least there was a theory.

Any trans identified woman who is pregnant has to come off the hormone to facilitate the pregnancy, and normal oestrogen levels resume.

By using terms like "people" you deny any research and evidence into the matter. It is very dangerous when it comes to health, as you start to mask patterns and trends. And it is dangerous to either sex.

PermanentTemporary · 02/04/2022 10:18

Im not a subscriber. I wonder if it changes the statistics? I always understood that males were at greater risk from Covid than females - so is the multiplier of risk the same between the two groups?

New posts on this thread. Refresh page
Swipe left for the next trending thread