Female and non binary

[Blackandwhitehorse]

www.theguardian.com/artanddesign/gallery/2022/mar/08/showcasing-australian-female-and-non-binary-photographers-in-pictures

I keep seeing this grouping. It’s almost like they know these women are in fact women after all, not the mythical non binary people.

Sorry I'd love to engage but I physically can't click on a guardian article.

Made me laugh @Linguini - I am suffering from the same problem lately!

Presumably though non-binary male people could apply, although at the moment it appears that every photographer on the list is female.

The Guardian gallery is an excerpt of photos from women in this directory - www.auswip.com.au/ @Linguini, if you'd like to bypass and avoid adding to their traffic.

@Linguini 🤣 don’t blame you

Weirdly I also saw a glamour article about women being missed for ADHD diagnosis and halfway through they added non binary people. But then would that also then apply to trans men?! Surely it would as they seem to be basing it on biology rather than gender otherwise why include non binary.

It just shows the gender advocates don’t really understand it

So we are beginning to see more and more of this description of 'female' being used in the attempt to limit it to 'females'. I only hope in time the pendulum can swing back to be able to use women and mean only females. But for now, we have females and 'non-binary females'.

As I said on the Sainsbury's thread, I cannot argue about this. Because they are trying to ensure women are recognised for their achievements without the encroachment of males.

However, they have used 'female-identifying people'. To me that reads that they are inclusion of males anyway. And if so, they should be upfront and declare it mixed sex. Or... they have got the terminology skewiff in their attempt to be open to any female, however those female identify.

I have now started to be so very suspicious whenever I see the word 'women' these days. What a state of play! And we have posters crowing about it on other threads.