What a sad situation. One that should
never be allowed to happen.
I think one of the most puzzling things to me is certainly in developed counties, people who signed up to do a job that wasn't heavy on social responsibility ends up being so anyway. Any shop or industry that involves the selling of age restricted items, well identifying vulnerabilities/coercion etc is part of the job. Keeping the money and our noses clean.
Advice is say give homeless people food not money so they can't spend it on non food items.
Should we be providing this service to someone who potentially doesn't understand what they are doing and could potentially be exploited.
And this is just for goods. Services.
People are rightly horrified when a lonely elderly old lady with dementia is rinsed for thousands of pounds on hew windows she doesn't need.
Yet when it comes to the selling/buying if womens bodies there's a massive blind spot to all of it. It's apparently not the same . They get paid we are nice to them they couldn't ask to be treated better etc.
If we swapped out the baby for 200 pounds worth of scratch cards, people would rightly recognise that someone so poor they were talking about selling a kidney just to buy food, well enabling a gambling addiction would be unethical.
But if its a baby suddenly it's OK?
Makes no sense at all. The buyers clearly don't care if the women live or die provided they get their baby. A full term healthy baby mind. I wonder how many premature disabled babies are actually taken home to the UK...
But it's all OK because suddenly in this one situation consent matters and she chose to do it absolving everyone of any responsibility