Charles Moore's brother! Well it's a small world, is media land.
I haven't heard the debate so all I can go on is what he's stated.
But when he says that she doesn't diminish her opponents, and then quotes her saying she's a woman and she is not scared, that is what I would think is diminishing, indeed trivialising the risks to women and girls, the fears that other women and girls do have and the extreme discomfort that they feel, to the point of schoolgirls and women in workplaces avoiding the loo and indeed both women and men in offices hating these loos.
And then that a gender recognition certificate is irrelevant to single sex spaces. So it's just open access for all? And why if it's irrelevant is it so important to make it easier to get? The certificate was supposed to be the final stage in long complex process that a very few people would undergo. The whole thing was never intended for anyone who felt like it to simply declare a gender identity and thereby acquire a right of access to women's and girls' spaces in schools, hospitals and so on.