NYT cancels JK Rowling

[Rosiesmydog]

unherd.com/thepost/the-new-york-times-erases-jk-rowling/

She who shall not be named 😡😡😡😡

There is a big world outside the little coterie of MN Rowling worshippers.

@Viviennemary

There is a big world outside the little coterie of MN Rowling worshippers.

It's not about worshipping her, it's about critical thinking and understanding that a small group of people are very wrong in their opinions. She has done nothing to deserve the awful treatment from the haters.

@Porcupineintherough

Tbh I've always managed to enjoy various art forms without thinking of their creators at all - never know the director's name, rarely the author's, or anything about the artist beyond theirs. What I want to know is why Lianna's opinion on any if this is worth reporting any more than mine would be. Why is Lianna news?

By Giove I thinks she's got it.

YOU should be Editor of the New York TImes.

@Viviennemary

There is a big world outside the little coterie of MN Rowling worshippers.

500 million book sold world wide is now a little coterie?

Is the another new definition?

What did JKR actually do. What was the tweet the set this all of? I know she was telling the truth but does anyone have a screen shot of the actual tweets?

*Jove...

This one?

And here's her essay. www.jkrowling.com/opinions/j-k-rowling-writes-about-her-reasons-for-speaking-out-on-sex-and-gender-issues/

@Brefugee

as someone on the twitter thread said, it is funny that the NYT doesn'T imagine certain films without Roman Polanski / Woody Allen /Harvey Weinstein. Funny indeed

Just thinking about how many careers Harvey Weinstein destroyed and how many people enabled him because he's a nasty grubby predator. How much creativity has been lost, but no JKR is the bad guy because she believes what we all believed until a few years ago that biological sex is real.