BBC heavily 'managing' the story

[Artichokeleaves]

www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-60435954

Second article this week (they link to the first one) in which no mention at all is made of why women's groups have concerns and gives the appearance that they're just doing it out of mindless prejudice, and interviews and presents sympathetic TW accounts while not providing any balancing mention at all from any female, never mind one from one of the concerned groups.

I particularly enjoyed the ageism alongside the misogyny in the census article which made gently clear that issues with female rights and issues is for the old, past it and irrelevant.

'BBC; it's for everyone'? Don't make me laugh. If this is for the politically partisan then they can bloody fund it.

Busy day in the US, feel for Cathrine Buroker who was gaslighted out her swimming record and The New York Times hiding their hate behind "Lianna"

We make a small amount of headway, then get hammered. The BBC hides anything pro women in the trans debate and we think that's good!

Also note in the other article (about the census) the careful use of a sweet TM not a TW when the issue is male people being defined as women instead of their own group destroys women's access, equality and inclusion. The optics so very very carefully presented. A TW obviously was considered a risk of the general public having unhelpful ideas and insights.

Yes indeed. I used to be very pro BBC as an independent source of new but no more.

Partisan bullshit can find their own source of funding

• news