I'm not sure what such hyperbolic writing achieves to be honest. Did anyone else find it a tad OTT? I think the facts of the situation speak for themselves without all the hyperbole. I didn't know who the writer was but felt some unease as I was reading it - felt a bit fire and brimstoney.
The information he is relating is, on the whole, sound and evidenced but some snidey comments and plain bad writing made me recoil slightly. The reference to The Finns (would 'Finland' not have sufficed?) and also referring to Carrie as Boris Johnson's 'millenial, live-in fiancee' - ewww. And 'horrifying civilizational medical experimentation' is just bad writing.
And then I found out he's a very enthusiastic Pro-Lifer and I can only imagine how he rants about that subject like he's up on a pulpit.
There's so many other good journalists writing on this subject I'm not sure this added anything to our understanding of the situation. And I'm sure it's not a publication many on MN read on a regular basis - it seems rather 'niche' - but I could be wrong.
I'm not one for dismissing everything someone says just because I don't agree with that person's politics or religion or politics per se. A stopped clock and all that. But I'm not particularly enamoured of this piece of writing and have learnt nothing new from it.