Meet the Other Phone. A phone that grows with your child.

Meet the Other Phone.
A phone that grows with your child.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Good Law Project files for judicial review of NHS England

105 replies

PurgatoryOfPotholes · 22/12/2021 07:48

The statement from the GLP website is as follows.

Back in October, we told you we were preparing to issue proceedings against NHS England over its long-standing, lengthy and unlawful delays to meeting trans people’s healthcare needs.

Less than two months later, we are now filing our claim for Judicial Review. In that time, the shape of the case has changed slightly, so we wanted to tell you what’s new.

We’re bringing this claim against the NHS alongside two adult claimants, two child claimants and trans-led grassroots charityGendered Intelligence.The claim now focuses on six key problems with NHS trans healthcare provision. We argue:

1. NHS England has failed, under regulation 45(3) of the 2012 Regulations, to ensure that 92 per cent of trans patients who are referred for medical treatment begin that treatment within 18 weeks of referral.

2. NHS England has failed, under section 3B of the National Health Service Act 2006, to provide services for children needing puberty blockers that they can access before starting puberty.

3. NHS England have failed, under the NHS Constitution, to uphold the rights of adult patients with gender dysphoria to begin treatment within 18 weeks of referral.

4. NHS England has unlawfully discriminated against trans people because waiting times for gender identity services are longer than for the vast majority of other healthcare services.

5. NHS England’s decision to introduce and maintain a ‘Multi-Professional Review Group’ as part of puberty-delaying treatment for trans children is unlawfully directly or indirectly discriminatory. We also think the Service Specification unlawfully requires both the child and their parents to consent to treatment, contrary to the principles established in GillickandAB v CD.

6. NHS England has failed to comply with its public sector equality duty to ensure trans people can access acute services by setting up the Multi-Professional Review Group for trans children and in the arrangements it makes with providers.

Eva Echo, one of the adult claimants in this case, explains the impact of waiting so long for treatment. “I would describe being on the waiting list as torture, and there were times when I felt that I may not even be alive long enough to receive my first appointment. Being on the waiting list was no comfort; I desperately needed help.

“My mental health was worse than it had ever been; coming out had allowed me to recognise my gender dysphoria, but I was left completely alone to manage it. I felt, and still feel, completely let down by the system that I thought was there to save me.”

For too long, the NHS has failed to prioritise trans healthcare. We, alongside many affected individuals, medical professionals, families and campaigners for trans rights, believe the current system is not fit for purpose. The available services simply aren’t meeting the needs of the people they should be helping. Too many trans people have died waiting for the treatment they were entitled to. Many more suffer in ways that are entirely preventable. The bottom line is that trans people have a right to access essential care, just like everyone else.

OP posts:
PurgatoryOfPotholes · 23/12/2021 11:52

@Helleofabore

“The Tribunal has agreed to hear our arguments as to why the LGB so-called Alliance (LGBA) should not have been given charitable status.”

purgatory not that I doubted you, but I DID go and check this against the original statement.

How professional is that? How does this charity expect to be taken seriously if it keeps making statements in the tone of a petulant child? Blimey. When will the adults enter the building?

Mermaids are so proud of their employment of "so-called" that they've tweeted it.

The Tribunal has agreed to hear our arguments as to why the LGB so-called Alliance should not have been given charitable status. The hearing will take place in May 2022.

twitter.com/Mermaids_Gender/status/1473595418672091136?t=R7xAgSqf6wQN5egJy0t3Bw&s=19

OP posts:
VeryLongBeeeeep · 23/12/2021 13:20

Why was that post deleted which was pointing out trans people can't have it both ways, it's either a mental illness which causes them to feel suicidal or it's not? Seemed a valid point to make in the context of the desired JR?

WarriorN · 23/12/2021 13:55

Doesn't nice also have to weigh up the implications of life long medical support?

There aren't any other conditions where initial treatment for a healthy body will result in the individual needing a lot of extra medical care in the future.

Many interventions are given based on longer term cost effectiveness.

Talking therapy is an option that would be cost effective but is dismissed.

WarriorN · 23/12/2021 14:35

Posting this extremely concerning documentary from Sweden, looking at the horrific impact of pb on bone density of young people.

www.svtplay.se/video/33358590/uppdrag-granskning/mission-investigate-trans-children-avsnitt-1

Ereshkigalangcleg · 29/12/2021 07:59

We're assuming the GLP are doing this to get some kind of "win". Maybe instead they'd be happy with a "lose" that they can spin as some kind of The Most Oppressed Ever™ narrative.

YY, my thought too.

New posts on this thread. Refresh page