digest.bps.org.uk/2021/12/02/women-are-no-more-emotionally-turbulent-than-men/
This came through is my email recently and I am irrationally annoyed about it.
" The team found very little statistical evidence for differences between men and women on any of these measures (in fact, men showed slightly more variability in mood than women). Similarly, there was little evidence that women on oral contraception differed from women not using contraception.
This has significant consequences in research settings. As the team notes, cisgender women are being excluded from research because of a perception that their moods are unstable "
This may be the wrong forum for this discussion, so let me know and I will ask MN to move it.
The use of "cis" and that last sentence, in particular, leaves with me rage.
Seriously, I had a conversation with a paramedic earlier this week, about the different presentations of women with cardiac issues. They said they weren't aware of any difference.
I had a conversation with a Psychologist last month, about the presentation of girls with ASD, and that the "gold standard" ASD diagnostic tools, are developed in a research cohort that is primarily male. So tools to diagnose ASD catch males with ASD because they're developed with males.
Surely, surely, in this day and age, everyone is aware of the structural in systemic expulsions that women experience?
Or, is it that my eyes have been opened so wide by the wise women here? 