Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Violent crime against women gets the same status as terrorist attacks

16 replies

SocialConnection · 22/11/2021 08:36

Violent crime against women gets the same status as terrorist attacks

Fiona Hamilton, Crime Editor
Monday November 22 2021, 12.01am, The Times

Since the murder of Sarah Everard there has been concern about the response to violent crimes against women

Violence against women and girls will be elevated to the same status as terrorism under a proposed government directive, The Times has learnt.

Chief constables will be mandated to increase resources and combine capabilities in a drastic effort to drive up rape convictions, which have reached historically low levels.

Violence against women and girls is set to be added to the strategic policing requirement, meaning that police will be required by government to treat it as a major priority. It is an acknowledgement by ministers that there is an epidemic of violence against women that needs to be one of the most urgent national crimefighting priorities.

There has been a national outcry about the response to levels of violence against women since the Metropolitan Police officer Wayne Couzens abused his powers to abduct, rape and murder Sarah Everard in March.

Police faced criticism for their response after the onus was placed on women to check the credentials of officers who spoke to them on the street.

Government announcements such as placing undercover police officers in nightclub districts were criticised as not robust enough.

In 2019-20 57,000 rapes were reported to police but there were only 1,109 convictions, the lowest in history. Three quarters of domestic abuse cases result in no further action. The majority of stalking and harassment offenders have escaped prosecution in recent years, instead handed informal punishments such as rehabilitation courses or an apology to the victim.

The Home Office will add violence against women and girls to the strategic policing requirement, a national initiative that sets out what resources police forces must deploy to respond effectively to specific crimes. It means that female violence has been elevated to an urgent national priority alongside terrorism, serious and organised crime and child sexual abuse.

Policing priorities are published annually by the home secretary. The requirements that will be placed on forces to tackle violence against women and girls are unclear.
Sponsored

However, the focus of the requirement is to ensure forces work in collaboration to tackle shared threats, and that adequate amounts of money and manpower are focused on the most serious criminal issues.

The proposed directive came after police forces were accused of a “male brotherhood” culture that ignored female violence and harassment.

Dame Vera Baird, the victims commissioner, claimed last week that police were protective of each other because of male “bonding” and said that rape investigation units looked into the credibility of complainants more than the offences of perpetrators. She told senior officers at a conference that offenders were emboldened by the “essentially male brotherhood culture” in policing.

Maggie Blyth, the deputy chief constable of Hampshire police and the new national police lead for violence against women and girls, said police forces would put a “relentless focus on perpetrators”.

She said that trust between women and the police had been “broken through some of the tragic events of the last few weeks and months”. She said a “perpetrator-focused approach” to disrupt and track sex offenders would help to restore confidence."

www.thetimes.co.uk/article/violent-crime-against-women-gets-the-same-status-as-terrorist-attacks-5tp2fn3pv?shareToken=3d79deed3b97ad4bc4abc137c99361b3&fbclid=IwAR30jEcxn69MTlo5KcRWjcjaURkd1PNdKy47PKjesCFN0MC8qsDCm9D0vfI

OP posts:
Fariha31 · 22/11/2021 08:42

If this is what is says it is, then this is really good news.

picklemewalnuts · 22/11/2021 09:04

Well it's a hopeful start....

WomenTalkingAboutARevolution · 22/11/2021 09:04

About time

Helleofabore · 22/11/2021 09:24

I do hope so.

ArabellaScott · 22/11/2021 10:35

Good.

JellySaurus · 22/11/2021 10:57

As ever, whenever there's a new initiative announced promoting equity for women, I'd just like to check: what is a woman?

Ereshkigalangcleg · 22/11/2021 11:01

Yes exactly, Jelly. I am cautiously hopeful but wary.

Hoardasurass · 22/11/2021 11:14

That's a good article and I hope the changes will be effective however the comments under the article are depressing all what about men and girls/women are all liers and a strong wiff of misogyny

Thelnebriati · 22/11/2021 11:49

Archived (without the Facebook link.)
www.thetimes.co.uk/article/violent-crime-against-women-gets-the-same-status-as-terrorist-attacks-5tp2fn3pv?shareToken=3d79deed3b97ad4bc4abc137c99361b3

Reading the comments, it becomes clear that men are the real victims of male violence against women Hmm

Evelyn52 · 22/11/2021 13:27

The article lifted my spirits but the comments made them crash and burn 🙄

Datun · 22/11/2021 13:53

It's a start. You have to acknowledge the problem, and take steps.

Like others, I'm cynical, but it is a start.

Eyesofdisarray · 22/11/2021 14:00

Those comments! People just don't get it

Snugglepumpkin · 22/11/2021 14:27

I'll believe that when I see it.

My neighbours called the police once because they heard shouting.
The police were let in by my ex & found me unconscious as he had put a pillow over my face until I lost consciousness.
It was a terrifying experience fighting to breathe & feeling myself losing.
I don't know how long I was out for.
I found out later I was black & blue from the neck down, which the police never knew because they never checked anything.

They took him into the station for a few hours & I don't know what happened there but he never heard from them again about it.
I fled to someone elses house while he was gone & I know they let him out so fast because he was really pissed off that he couldn't find me & started calling round everyone he knew I knew looking for me.

Police never followed up with me, never charged him with anything & never even bothered to take me to the hospital & being a young idiot I didn't know I should have done anything.

We didn't have a history of this sort of thing.
It was his first move in being an abuser.
He'd never even raised his voice before that.
I'm saying this to make it clear that they had never been called before so they weren't dismissing me as someone they frequently were called out to.

They just didn't care because I was a girl & I didn't actually die (think I might have if they hadn't come).
They pretty much said it was my fault as I must have provoked him when they were there.
That included a police woman as well as a police man.

My actual crime had been to forget to buy peppered pork steaks.
I have never been able to make myself buy one since.

Incidentally, he found me within a week & dragged me back.
He made sure I had no contact with anyone else so I never again had anyone to run to.
It took nearly 2 more decades of abuse before I finally got free.
Some of it was much much worse than just being suffocated.
I had learned the lesson that the police don't help women well & never dared call them after that though.

There wasn't internet back then so it was much harder to find things out like how wrong the way I had to live was, or that there were ways to get free.

nosafeguardingadults · 22/11/2021 14:37

Think is meaningless gesture words cos reality is laws already here on violence against women including domestic violence many times not enforced. What point new law or new define of it if nothing done in what's already meant to be done.

Is postcode lottery if help and is problem made worse cos not national help and victims we fall through gaps lots cos if we moving areas like to refuges or just moving house. We move and gap fall cos old area immediately drops you and notes often not shared on or new area doesn't care and doesn't want to take more work on and is all lost in translation.

Is same problem with police, domestic abuse agencies, social services, family courts, housing. Some very good and kind but is all big lottery and lotsa them do safeguarding fails and break law and get away with it cos not enough help and if you try to speak out about it, they tell to you to shut up and you called trouble maker. Is not to cause trouble is out of desperation to try to get help and to try to help it make it better for other women.

Wish people realised reality for many of us. Is so bad some of it. People sometimes don't believe me but have proof of some of it. Messages including begging support places for help with evidence of serious violence and serious risk and they don't care.

Sorry to annoy everyone but admit am bitter and cynical but is good reason to be.

Best way help for stopping violence against women is safe homes long term safe homes and good support for victims including after the crimes for physical, practical, emotional recovery. Is not going to happen. If I am wrong is very good thing but too much to hope for think but maybe I too cynical. Is easy to say words call it terrorism call it anything they want say on level with but isn't important. Cos what is important isn't what it's called or level is said is at. Only important thing is not happening for many women and it is practical help.

Fariha31 · 22/11/2021 14:50

Last year I was assulted and there was an independent witness and he was held for a few hours and then released.
They did nothing, absolutly nothing. Said there was not enough evidence even though there were pictures and a witness. The officers who came told me he would definetly be charged but apparently the duty sargent thought otherwise.

nosafeguardingadults · 22/11/2021 15:06

Am irrational cos glad my case he never been charged cos rather be killed by him quickly than be homeless but think still wish police interviewed witnesses like all neighbours who call police. Cos maybe best having witness evidence if future safe way out. Is irrational for me cos don't want him charged. Think should be more understanding for what victim wants and needs and should be evidence taken but not forced to go through court. My case though don't blame police cos they was kinder than many other places including my local domestic abuse agencies and council social services and housing. They were as abusive mentally as abuser. Was worse cos abuser loves you sometimes but cold cruel nasty support services who break laws and fail safeguarding don't care ever. Is problem local services onky cos fall through gaps cos police thought was getting support but cos moved areas, support service didn't follow up so was left alone. Is also very bad to turn victims away cos they live in different area cos if serious violence and victim desperate and begging for help, shouldn't turn them away if they have nowhere else to turn. Sometimes good reason why can't turn to local services. Sometimes cos local one very bad doesn't care doesn't do their job but sometimes other reason like connection to victim or abuser. Is bad to leave victims risk of harm cos they not local is bad message cos how does woman then feel safe to flee area to refuges when message big message is you stealing local women place. Is also bad cos lots of refuges turn you away if you not local woman.

New posts on this thread. Refresh page