This is really useful summary especially the closing paras quoted.
I would love it if solicitors could publish more examples of what poor organisational practice is post-Forstater ideally though- maybe it could even inform a training that women’s groups could provide at a charge to corporate organisations to generate some income for themselves.
So many employers (for example) don’t understand what Forstater means. They’ll think imposing Stonelaw is doing the right thing because that what they’ve paid to be told. So this is not only about staff training creating an anti-woman and anti-lesbian climate in professional groups etc - its also all the rest of the things that some companies bring in to be ‘progressive’ too. And some of them without even bothering to spend money on the kind of staff training that can create that climate, just motivated out of their own misogynistic instincts.
Women post on here about all sorts of pressures that come out of this dogma - like to get everyone on staff to use pronouns professionally in meetings and email signatures, which is also a way of outing gender critical people. Or employers removing single sex washing toileting or changing facilities from staff. Or those allowing opposite-sex colleagues who want to, to use unadapted single-sex facilities. Would be really useful if the ability of women to object to all these things without fear (based on the protected beliefs established in Forstater) could be outlined in one place or one training package.