This article is currently at the top of the BBC homepage
www.bbc.co.uk/bbcthree/article/a536d462-6272-4688-827d-d17d63d20fdf
When I clicked on it I was surprised to see that the subject is referred to throughout by female pronouns, even though it seems pretty clear that this person is a gay man whose 'real name' (quote from the article, so obviously not considered a dead name) is Harry.
I find drag insulting and offensive so have never watched Drag Race and try to avoid the whole drag phenomenon, so my question is, is it standard practice to refer to these men who dress up in bizarre fancy dress costumes as women? My limited understanding was that it was very much a male thing, a core part of gay culture, so being male is kind of key (and I have a feeling there was a story recently about there being an actual female on one of these programmes, and it being quite a big thing?) A quick look at Harry/Charity's social media suggests that he doesn't see himself as anything other than male - no pronouns in bio, lots of instagram posts of his very male body. So why are the BBC referring to him as female, especially in an article about HIV, to which gay men are still (I think?) particularly at risk in this country?
Has womanhood become a sort of catch-all category for anyone who doesn't fit into the category of Masculine? Or is the BBC just observing the generic convention of drag culture? (which I think is even more reason to find it offensive appropriation, if so.)