Eh what????
'"If anyone came into our spaces and was debating our rights, the right for us to exist and for spaces in which we feel safe, then I think that we would be pushing back in the same way that trans people and their allies are today. I think we would all feel very angry if people were trying to take away our rights."'
Seriously??
Did she understand what she said?
Because in saying that transpeople and allies are fighting back against others who have come into their spaces and are trying to take away their rights.
That means that all the single sex things that were female in the past.
Have actually always been trans spaces?
And that women are pushing their way into the trans spaces and want to remove their rights to those spaces?
Yes? I mean I've read it 4 times and I can't see another meaning.
So in that one statement.
The whole fight to get single sex spaces is gone. The lobbying, fundraising, arguing, volunteering everything women did. They were always trans spaces and it's women demanding entry?
Single sex prisons have been in place for a long time. They were always for trans people? Women are shouldering their way in when women's prisons were never meant for us at all?
She doesn't know what the fuck is coming out of her mouth. Jesus.
Unless anyone else can give a more reasonable interpretation?