I'm sure this has already been discussed here, so would be happy to be pointed to an older thread, but I'd like find out more about "preferred pronouns", especially with regards to the arguments that not using preferred pronouns is an act of violence against the individual with said pronouns. Much preferably with regards to ordinary every day life/ ordinary people (ie not rapists as "she" - that I will never do, and it's a hill I'll die on.)
I struggle hugely to express this properly, but for example my view on this is that I'm fine with using someone's pronouns if there is some coherence between the way somebody presents themselves and the pronouns they want me to use (yes, yes, I know, face to face the only pronouns needed are "you" and "I", but there are also situations where you might need to refer to somebody in the third person to - for example - a group of their pronoun accepting peers.)
So I'm fine with the idea of using "he" for somebody who present as male, "she" for somebody who present as female, and "they" for somebody who either have enough signifiers of both genders or if I genuinely can't tell what sex they are (I'm perfectly fine with not knowing, in case anybody's wondering).
So...in other words...am I saying I'm fine using the pronouns that correspond to the sexist stereotypes of gender we've all been fed????????
And am I being sexist if I struggle with using the "right" pronouns if the gender markers aren't there???? Or should I just accept that a man who "reads" fully as a man, ie has no female gender signifiers at all, but says his pronouns are she/her, should indeed be referred to by female pronouns (and vice versa), and I'm being sexist if I struggle with that? (I have no idea if there are men out there who do that by the way! Also, this is me examining my beliefs around sex and gender, it's purely internal, at least at the moment.)
It would be wonderful to have some thoughts from the community, if you'd care (or pointers to another thread, or a similar discussion somewhere else).