Its still seems to be more a woman thing.
It's a combo. It's "intersectionality" hitting someone twice, as per its own precepts.
Part of the point of any identity politics group is to suppress the individual voices of members of that group, and elevate particular people as "representatives".
The groups are expected to have one unified group identity and viewpoint. Any dissidents are then deemed to be self-hating, "not really black" or whatever.
So black women are hit with this twice - once for not having correct black opinions, and again for not having correct woman opinions.
Part of all this nonsense is the attempt to make "woman" an "identity" rather than a material reality - and that identity includes the approved "toe the libfem line and pander to men" opinions. The "TERF" epithet for women is functionally the same as "Uncle Tom" - not having the correct opinion for the group.
The slightly odd thing is that the woman identity group is supposed to centre males. Those of other races are expected to centre their own race (and its self-appointed leaders), so they're usually attacked for things not perceived as being sufficiently anti-white, or being in some way "anti-black" (eg not having the prejudice of low expectations, or disagreeing with the "community leaders").
But women are attacked for standing up for females. They become traitors to their group identity by standing up for their group's individuals.
Thus, despite intersectionality, women are the only group directly prevented from ever centring themselves. Idpol says no, sorry, that's not part of the correct group behaviour.
(Idpol largely undermines intersectionality anyway, because there's assumed to never be any conflict. Different oppression axes aren't allowed to have different conflicting needs - someone is expected to be able to be oppressed on all axes simultaneously, and the views related to each are supposed to mesh harmoniously. There Is One Unified Theory of the correct view, and id groups just concentrate on one part of it. It's as if there's a Central Committee somewhere...)