I didn't call you names. I asked you to raise the level of debate.
I don't know if there are absolutes or not. I support the law on murder, sexual abuse, slavery etc. But I try to be open to rational argument about why things might need to be changed or done differently due to changing circumstances. I do know that whenever anyone in my life has said 'This isn't up for discussion' that there's been an awful lot to discuss.
In this particular case, we already know that a great many children are exposed to pornography, in some cases extreme pornography, and some of the children see it at a very early age. Having a debate about how to tackle this issue and discussing whether it might be appropriate to use some carefully chosen images as a teaching tool is perfectly legitimate.
You don't have to be a leftie to wonder whether the Conservatives, who favour defunding the BBC so that we're left with a largely unaccountable privately-owned media, might have a vested interest in getting people worked up into a lather about it. Just look again at the first line of Tesla's OP:
Saw this article from TCW site which shows that once again Auntie Beeb shows its hand in terms of corrupting children
That's hardly a neutral statement, is it? And when you look into it a bit further the BBC was only asking whether it's a good idea or not.