Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Any scientists/academics who can explain the rationale behind the idea of ‘sex is a social construct’?

77 replies

4ammusings · 31/07/2021 02:29

Just that really. I am trying to understand where this idea has come from and how the science supposedly backs it up (as declared by many trans activists). I understand that intersex people do exist and there are certain conditions that cause sex ambiguity, therefore technically sex isn’t strictly binary in all circumstances. However, from my understanding, most people still fall into the categories of male or female, based on their chromosomes.

I have a family member who is a biologist yet strongly believes sex is non-binary and merely assigned at birth. I can’t understand how she reconciles her biological knowledge with this seemingly ideological concept which appears (to me anyway) to have no real basis in science. I also can’t discuss this with her as she is so aggressively part of the TWAW brigade that the topic is not up for reasonable or respectful discussion.

Am I missing something here? Happy to be proved wrong, and she undoubtedly does have more biological knowledge than me. I just haven’t heard any convincing scientific evidence to date to actually back this claim up and am wondering if any scientists could please weigh in? Just to clarify, I understand the argument that gender is a social construct, but am talking specifically here about biological sex (just so the two aren’t conflated).

OP posts:
NiceGerbil · 31/07/2021 21:05

'^Over recent years I've seen claims that someone being trans means they have an intersex of the brain condition, and them having a conventional "bodily" DSD is neither here nor there. '

When things are separated by sex it's because of our bodies.

I've yet to see any even slightly convincing argument as to why males should be in women's stuff because they say so.

thinkingaboutLangCleg · 01/08/2021 07:31

people like James Lindsay and Helen Pluckrose … have been analysing the deconstruction techniques being used to undermine knowledge and acquire power by hucksters. It's easier to do "critical X studies" than X for any discipline, so underachieving academics from every field are attracted to this nonsense-producing endeavour.

I always learn something interesting from Mumsnet. Lots on this thread. And it’s usually more useful or relevant than I’d read on a MSM news site. Thanks, all you wonderful vipers.

New posts on this thread. Refresh page
Swipe left for the next trending thread