Indeed MoreRainThatAnyYet
The thing is, that might have been true historically, when transitioners were very rare and had to be very determined. I don't think you can say yet whether it's true of the recent greatly increased numbers of transitioners.
It is probably also an inconvenient truth that was discovered in the study I have linked below.
Strangely, many people overlook this study which was posted by a poster back in March (although it did not 'quite' highlight what they thought it did, but it was interesting in other ways).
Effects of Medical Interventions on Gender Dysphoria and Body Image: A Follow-Up Study. 30th August 2017
The aim of this study from the European Network for the Investigation of Gender Incongruence is to investigate the status of all individuals who had applied for gender confirming interventions from 2007 to 2009
The main objective of follow-up on the cohort was to provide a description of the current status of all applicants after 4 to 6 years after clinical entry and describing participants with and without medical transition
135 natal males (119 living in the female role, 12 in the male role, 4 did not report their current gender role) and 66 natal females (60 living in the male role, 5 in the female role, 1 did not report a current gender role)
So if you work the sums... 8.88% of males and 8.33% of the females detransitioned (this does not include those who did not answer the question which if the answer was to detransition would make these figures higher). And in Figure 3. 22.2% of those who socially transitioned, detransitioned.
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5580378/
So, I even now question the 'lack of detransition' rhetoric pushed by some posters in regards to historical transition rates. I suspect, and it is just my thinking, that detransitioners have been silenced for many reasons for a very long time.