Meet the Other Phone. A phone that grows with your child.

Meet the Other Phone.
A phone that grows with your child.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Excellent article here in The Spectator

12 replies

Campervan69 · 07/07/2021 15:30

"Ultimately the British court made it clear that there was a conflict between trans rights and women’s safety, but because of the raft of legislation that has been passed, it was unable to protect the women prisoners from the male transgender prisoners.Once the ethereal concept of “gender identity” is in law, males and females are required to act out invented realities."

www.spectator.com.au/2021/07/why-should-women-tolerate-the-big-swinging-dicks-of-the-transgender-movement/

Please note the author of the article did not choose the title The Spectator chose to run with.

OP posts:
Ereshkigalangcleg · 07/07/2021 15:31

Once the ethereal concept of “gender identity” is in law, males and females are required to act out invented realities."

Yes, very true.

OvaHere · 07/07/2021 16:13

Very good article and to the point. Refreshing to see an article not trying to twist itself in knots.

PurpleHoodie · 07/07/2021 16:15

Yes.

PurpleHoodie · 07/07/2021 16:16

I'm going to start buying hard copies.

zafferana · 07/07/2021 16:34

Ultimately the British court made it clear that there was a conflict between trans rights and women’s safety, but because of the raft of legislation that has been passed, it was unable to protect the women prisoners from the male transgender prisoners. Once the ethereal concept of “gender identity” is in law, males and females are required to act out invented realities.

The right to the protection of the vulnerability of the female sex, that was the cornerstone of the women’s rights movement, has been taken away by one simple Executive Order in the US, when Biden placed gender identity over sex as a protected characteristic. A woman in the US is now what the government say she is. She is an identity, a set of characteristics as vague or specific as government or courts feel at their leisure to define her.

Quite so.

ahagwearsapointybonnet · 07/07/2021 17:18

Wow, that is powerful stuff. I do hope it gets a wide audience!

PurpleHoodie · 07/07/2021 17:18

Trump had to go: but the women of US America got Biden and Harris. With their dangerous women hating policies.

I wouldn't be the least bit surprised if the Republicans got in next time.

So. Onto our country, and other countries worldwide: What's happening positively for female Rights?

Etorih · 07/07/2021 19:31

That is a very good article. Straight to the point.

PerditaNitt · 07/07/2021 19:39

Great article. Thank you for sharing.

TabbyStar · 07/07/2021 19:46

This bit particularly spoke to me as someone traumatised by male abuse as a child,

"We must therefore assume, that among us, are a large number of women who live with the psychological effects of sexual trauma. Such women are not going to declare this trauma as one declares their pronouns. And it would be no use, because her sexual reality does not exist in law or cultural power the way pronouns do."

MrsOvertonsWindow · 07/07/2021 20:59

Powerful and to the point. We need to keep bumping this so those cheerleading the rights of flashers are confronted with the reality.

Delphinium20 · 07/07/2021 21:10

This week we have a Black American woman in a Californian spa, horrified at the sight of a naked man in all his splendour walking around the women’s section of the spa where women and children are naked

In a country where we are SUPPOSED to be elevating Black voices, US media has buried and erased that this was a Black woman speaking up. Bravo for Australia for putting in the lede. I can't tell you how many times this 'anonymous transphobe' has been called Karen in the US commentary. Which is the irony of ironies. I find the US burying her race a type of racism...using Black women only when expedient.

New posts on this thread. Refresh page