Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

What the media gets wrong on gender reassignment

3 replies

stumbledin · 22/06/2021 19:12

The media is guilty of gross negligence on gender reassignment reporting

In 2007, the Dutch Protocol, as it is known, was brought to the States, initially to Boston Children’s Hospital. These days, blockers and hormones are available in many more American youth clinics, though access varies considerably by geography.

There are some crucial distinctions between the Dutch approach and how some US youth-gender clinicians currently practice. For example, because, as the Dutch clinicians Annelou de Vries and Peggy Cohen-Kettenis wrote in a 2012 article describing their protocol, ‘most gender dysphoric children will not remain gender dysphoric through adolescence’ (a finding that has emerged at multiple clinics), the Dutch clinic has historically discouraged childhood social transition, while also discouraging parents from shaming children for gender-nonconforming behavior. Clinicians there promote the practice of ‘watchful waiting’ until the onset of puberty, at which point, if the GD persists, it is taken as a useful indicator that blockers might be the right choice.

Further reflecting the clinic’s cautious approach, youth with significant mental health problems or a lack of family support (or both) have not been eligible for physical transition. So when we look at the Dutch-protocol data, we’re looking at a subset of kids and teens who were carefully assessed, over a long period of time, to ensure they had clinically significant gender dysphoria and that other mental health problems could be ruled out as the primary drivers of their distress. They all had good family support when they began transitioning.

To a vocal group of American clinicians and activists ardently seeking to expand access to youth medical transition, this is too cautious an approach — and there has been a backlash among some of them, not only against outright conversion therapy but also against Dutch-style ‘gatekeeping’. In 2018, Laura Edwards-Leeper, a highly regarded youth clinician who helped bring the Dutch approach to Boston, told me about ‘things almost being thrown at me at conferences’ because she favors in-depth assessment prior to medical transition.

spectatorworld.com/topic/media-wrong-gender-reassignment-transgender/

OP posts:
Thecatonthemat · 24/06/2021 11:16

Heard on R4 that surgery is “corrective” . No idea how that has happened.

NecessaryScene · 24/06/2021 11:24

Heard on R4 that surgery is “corrective” . No idea how that has happened.

Cos they've got the wrong body for their gender identity.

If you say you're a man, then your breasts are abnormal growths, which can be surgically corrected.

That's how they justify it in terms of medical insurance in the US.

(They need to justify payment for treatment somehow, and if being "trans" isn't an illness, then you have to say the body is wrong and needs to be corrected).

NecessaryScene · 24/06/2021 11:25

Obviously that's nonsense, as by their logic a lot of men have breasts, and it's perfectly normal. If you say men shouldn't have breasts you're an ignorant bigot.

But internal consistency is so 20th century.

New posts on this thread. Refresh page
Swipe left for the next trending thread