A spokesman for Edinburgh University said it was “a safe place for difficult conversations,” adding: “We are committed to defending freedom of speech and expression, as long as it is carried out within the law and in a respectful manner.
Very good comment below the article:
If you're committed to defending freedom of speech, you do not demand it is done in a "respectful" manner, especially when you set yourself up as the arbiter of what is respectful. Otherwise you are - quite obviously - only committed to respectful speech on your terms.
Stonewall's evolution is perhaps symbolic: an organisation set up to fight intolerance against one group, it then broadens its remit to remain relevant and justify its further existence, and then becomes increasingly intolerant once it has gained a foothold.
It's a phenomenon seen many times in various guises. Once an organisation has been set up, the overriding purpose of that organisation is to perpetuate itself.