Quite amazing that this should be in the Observer rather than, say, the Sunday Times. Interesting that it comes so soon after the Rowan Moore article. Also interesting that it’s by one of the paper’s star writers, Rachel Cooke, and she’s done a really good job of letting him argue his case. I’d love to know what internal battles are going on at the Observer.
The Observer editorial following Bell vs Tavistock NHS made clear that the editorial team understood the issues well:
6/12/2020
'The Observer view on the high court's ruling on puberty-blocking drugs for children
The court was correct to halt a disturbing trend among clinicians to assume those as young as 10 were fit to make life-altering decisions about gender identity'
concludes:
"There are serious questions about the way in which GIDS has been discharging its duty of care. It was unable to supply the most basic of data that the court asked for, including the age profile of children referred for puberty blockers, how many had a mental health diagnosis and data on their treatment pathway. And the judgment casts doubt on the gender-affirming model of treatment for children who present with gender dysphoria. The idea that a child as young as 10 can come to a fixed view about their gender identity that sets them on a path to irreversible medical treatment is alarming, yet has become embedded in clinical practice. As we have reported, longstanding concerns raised by clinicians at the Tavistock have been shut down, with one whistleblower facing disciplinary action.
Any questioning of the gender-affirming model – and the role that trauma, internalised hostility to same-sex attraction or misleading online material may play in gender dysphoria in teenagers – is dismissed as transphobic. This is a chilling state of affairs that is detrimental to child safety. There are children who will find last week’s judgment distressing and it is imperative they receive the professional support they need. Children are not pawns to be deployed in adult debates about identity. Bell’s bravery has paved the way for a child-centred judgment that gives them the protection they deserve."
www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2020/dec/06/the-observer-view-on-the-high-courts-ruling-on-puberty-blocking-drugs-for-children