Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Caroline Nokes (Chair WESC) Thought She Would Agree With the Feminists But Realised She Doesn't and We All Need to be Kind.

65 replies

gardenbird48 · 25/03/2021 11:48

So Caroline, the Chair of the Women & Equalities Select Committee thought that she would have agreed with the feminist (gc) view on this issue, but then realised that actually she doesn't and we need to budge over and stop worrying about being called pregnant people and stop dragging it down to the lowest common denominator, 'you know, the one example they can find of a transwoman who's attacked someone' Hmm

Trans rights are a major part of the remit of Nokes and her committee, which is currently undertaking the inquiry into the government’s response to Gender Recognition Act reform. (May’s government held a long consultation on updating the GRA and committed to introducing those reforms, which were later shelved by Johnson’s administration.) The committee hearings are extraordinarily sensitive, empathetic and detailed sessions with some of the leading figures on both sides of this debate, one of the most bitter in the current political landscape.

Nokes, in ways that largely go unnoticed, quietly encourages a lot of support and kindness towards trans people. I put this to her and she is clearly pleased that someone has noticed. “I think it was when we were doing the domestic abuse bill something really struck me about domestic abuse statistics for trans people,” she says: “they’re tiny in number, I absolutely acknowledge that, but as a proportion it’s much bigger.”

“These are people who have the worst experience of the health service, they, as young people, have a really rough time in education, they then end up in a relationship where they’re the victim of domestic abuse. You sort of look at it and think we have to make the system kinder to trans people, and instead of focusing on having a massive row about what constitutes a woman, and whether we’re going to refer to a pregnant person as a woman or not, can we not please just be a little bit kinder to people and work out how we can make life easier for trans people?”

“When we’ve become so much more tolerant about so many aspects of life, it just seems to be really, really awful that we can’t be more understanding, and everybody the whole time wants to drag it back to sort of the lowest common denominator and to wheel out, you know, the one example they can find of a trans woman who’s attacked someone. Please, you know, we can be kinder than that. We can be nicer than that.”

Some of those in public life making the kinds of arguments Nokes cites are squarely in her own demographic: women of a similar age and social status. (Although in general, women are more likely to be supportive of trans rights than men.) Does she ponder how she has reached a different conclusion to many people similar to her?

“Yeah, I do, and interestingly at some of the some of the GRA evidence sessions, I’ve gone into them with a sort of a preconceived view of, you know, my heart is with the 45-year-old feminist. Absolutely, you know, I’m going to agree with her. And then I sit and listen and I go ‘You know what, I just don’t agree with you.’ I think that’s good for me. It makes me challenge my thoughts, my views. That’s so important in life.

www.newstatesman.com/politics/uk/2021/03/caroline-nokes-i-worry-conservatives-are-slipping-backwards-being-narrow-minded

OP posts:
AdHominemNonSequitur · 25/03/2021 22:05

Noakes is skin stretched over ambition. It was entirely clear from the very first oral session that she was biased and has picked what she thinks is the winning side.

Ereshkigalangcleg · 25/03/2021 22:09

you know, the one example they can find of a transwoman who's attacked someone'

Such a nice respectful way to think about a a sexual assault on multiple women. Even if there was only one perpetrator ever, which we know there isn't.

FlyPassed · 26/03/2021 08:09

Does anyone know the process for complaining about the conduct of MPs running so-called consultations? The more I think about the way Noakes is handing this, the more angry I get.

From day one she's made it clear that she's already picked a side - how can she give us a fair hearing? On the very day the new consultation launched she was in the times saying that she thinks we're making a fuss about nothing, Beeee Kiiiind etc. Are they not even meant to pretend to be open-minded?

Ereshkigalangcleg · 26/03/2021 08:31

I think it's completely inappropriate.

Ereshkigalangcleg · 26/03/2021 08:43

It was the Parliamentary Standards Committee that rapped Crispin's knuckles - maybe we could write to them about Penny Mordaunt stating twaw at the Dispatch Box - effectively speaking on behalf of the government and lying to the House and for Caroline Nokes blatant bias against women's rights?

I think they are a good starting point.

thinkingaboutLangCleg · 29/03/2021 16:14

the one example they can find of a trans woman who’s attacked someone

If Ms Nokes can't find more than that, she's not looking.

prison statistics obtained from the MOJ through Freedom of Information requests [reveal that] 60 out of the 125 transgender prisoners in England and Wales in 2017 had at least one conviction for a sexual offence.

From fairplayforwomen.com/transgender-male-criminality-sex-offences/
Finding that online took me about 20 seconds.

ArabellaScott · 29/03/2021 16:18

I wonder if it would be worth asking the Baroness what the best approach would be? She'd be a woman who would know!

I agree that it seems unfair in the extreme to have a committee that has already decided who is the 'right side' before even starting the consultation. The hostility shown towards the panel of respected experts was risible.

ArabellaScott · 29/03/2021 16:18

'
All-Party Parliamentary Groups
Inquiry

The Committee is undertaking a wide-ranging inquiry into the rules for and regulation of All-Party Parliamentary Groups.
'

highame · 29/03/2021 16:27

I submitted to the Parliamentary Standards committee and the standards are pretty good but not if people aren't adhering. Impartiality is important and in recent years this has been eroded. No wonder faith in public institutions is massively diminished and thank you Ms Noakes for adding to the lack of faith

highame · 29/03/2021 16:28

All-Party Parliamentary Groups Inquiry this will be interesting and not before time

gardenbird48 · 29/03/2021 16:40

I feel a letter coming on - to the Parliamentary Standards Committee - assumed us commoners are allowed to write?

This is the second such interview Caroline has conducted as I remember...

ah here we go. Has she ever truly supported the Women bit of the Women & Equalities Select Committee I wonder.... it is quite scary how blinkered she is on the obvious conflict in rights and needs here - how many other Select Committee chairs are equally hard of thinking?

www.thetimes.co.uk/article/it-is-time-to-end-the-delays-over-trans-equality-cx2zsh0tw (I will get a share token if anyone wants to see it)

OP posts:
Ereshkigalangcleg · 29/03/2021 16:49

Anyone can make a complaint to them about parliamentary standards, it may be dealt with elsewhere but hopefully they would pass it on or point you in the right direction.

gardenbird48 · 29/03/2021 17:40

brilliant, thanks. I'll have a dig tomorrow and see if I can find some rules for conduct of the Chair of a Select Committee or Select Committees in general and see what I can put together.

OP posts:
Mumofgirlswholiketoplaywithmud · 29/03/2021 18:44

Placemarking

teawamutu · 29/03/2021 18:57

Yes, I'd like to know too.

New posts on this thread. Refresh page
Swipe left for the next trending thread