Well it's the same as saying "women and men feel unsafe walking home alone" or "people feel unsafe walking home alone"
Fine. Except of course it means we are no longer talking about male violence against women. We are talking about people's violence against people.
Again, fine. Except, of course, it also needs to be OK to talk about specifically male violence against women. Women have a specific type of risk from male violence that is different from the risk men have. Even gay men, or men with a gender ID.
Men are actually more likely to be attacked. But women are physically weaker, are never the aggressor, risk rape, and pregnancy from rape.
Crucially women are also socialised to weaken their boundaries against men and are structurally disadvantaged in society. And what is going on here, with the relentless insistence that we must not be allowed to speak about the crime that happens to women yet is never perpetrated by women, without also including some men, is a great example of that.
I'm amazed at the confidence of these people campaigning against male violence who simultaneously advocate for children to have no boundaries and who force open the door to women's prisons and rape crisis shelters to some males.
What amazing idea do they have which will suddenly end male violence I wonder? If only those stupid bigoted women before them who won the vote and who created women's shelters had ever tried to tackle this!
I'm dismayed by the their selective attention, that some women deserve protection, but not society's most vulnerable.