This is ticking over in my mind, so another thought. The crime prevention element of providing facilities for teenage boys, youths, is very real. Far better have them loitering at a skate and basketball park, in plain sight (and maybe the design intention is for them to be visible, not vigilant), than doing graffiti, drugs, stealing cars or something (though how loitering at skate parks prevents selling and doing drugs, or planning other escapades, I'm not sure).
But, isn't this idea predicated on some rather old-fashioned notions of what the youths would be doing otherwise? That marauding outdoors in groups is the natural way of youths? That's very pre-digital. Wouldn't many of them be at home playing computer games, remotely, together, now?
I'm thinking of the reasons scouts and cubs became mixed-sex. Because not enough boys wanted to do all that active, practical, outdoor-focused stuff any more.
Girl-Guiding has not had that problem. They're probably not always as outdoor-focused as Scouts but do do camping, outdoor games in summer, trips to climbing walls and adventure activity places. Plus, girls have chosen to join Cubs and Scouts.
That seems to make a case that girls are more interested in doing sporty, outdoor, group activities than boys. Not less.
So I do think that there is a flawed, outdated assumption at the base of focusing outdoor activity provision on boys and youths, which is that the natural habitat of youths, especially the troublesome ones, is outdoors. Beyond that, far more broadly, that the natural inhabitants of urban outdoor space, whose use of that space can be managed by design, are male.
Perhaps things have now switched around? Teenage boys are now more likely to stay at home, with their tech, while teenage girls are more likely to gather in real-life groups, so are the more natural inhabitants of outdoor public space.
I know our Council's youth services provide a lot of indoor activities, music and digital things which seem more in line with what teenagers want.
Then though, there's the concern that everybody should have the opportunity to get some exercise. But isn't gym fitness more appealing to most teen boys and young men? Those not already involved in team sports, or uninterested in any sport at all. The sub-set of teen boys actually interested in the type of outdoor, public-space provision offered, seems small.