I like this article in OU News
ounews.co/arts-social-sciences/why-the-world-rugby-guidelines-banning-trans-athletes-from-the-womens-game-are-reasonable/
Seems like sound logically applied arguments ... hard to refute.
But I especially like the author's 'lexical priority' approach which could be applied to many situations.
"What does that mean? From the possible set of rules that exist, it means first selecting those that are safe, then the safe rules that are also fair, then the safe and fair rules that are maximally inclusive.
This approach — first, do A, then B, then C — is better than an opaque attempt to “balance” all three at the same time."