Yeah that’s it ty! Duno why I couldn’t find it when I looked for it again.
And yes re the strategicly placed articles- that’s why I wanted to mention it on this thread because it felt v much like that, and a fair bit felt like lies. Obviously I remembered the Eddie izzard part slightly wrong, but it doesn’t for a second sound believable that anyone at eddies performance would challenge anyone this claimed. It just feels false, and even when it comes to lies in print I think gut instinct is often right.
I found everything in the article very strategic. That the discussion is about her rights (it’s not it’s all women’s rights) that those of us arguing against self Id are the ones trampling over lesbians (because lesbians feel being confused for a man erasure but the cotton ceiling inclusive??) the call for disabled people, gcn women and trans people to fill in the consultation (but not us ‘feminine’ women) the idea any woman whose not ‘feminine’ is being challenged on entering toilets (because women who wear skirts, have long hair and wear make up do so 100% of the time...) and the idea that people can’t tell whose male or female because we all identify others on whether they fit the toilet pic with skirt or trousers (even a seconds confusion becomes obvious when someone talks or moves) or the idea that ‘butch’ women women would be confusing for us (tw are the ones who choose long hair, make up, skirts and heels because of their ‘inner female essence’ or whatever the fuck, so obviously it’s not butch women who are confusing anyone).
It read very much like scripted gas lighty head fuckery and felt very much placed to counter the cases calling out stonewalls lack of support/blatant betrayal. Feels very much like a slight of hand.