Is anyone watching what's is going on at GenderGP.
Christmas seems to have come early for them and they have even launched a charitable fund so benefactors can pay for the treatment of anyone (including kids) unable to pay privately.
They believe yesterdays judgement does not apply to them and want the Tavistock to change their advice suggesting it does.
I can understand the judgement was not directed at them but can't see how they are excluded from the courts interpretation of informed consent. If the Tavistock are not able to obtain that consent, how can GenderGP? I know they have some strange structure but consent is acquired by staff working in the UK.