Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Women's football under Lockdown 2

7 replies

JellySlice · 10/11/2020 21:43

Women's football shutdowns: 'It's unfair boys' academies can still play'

...elite protocols under Covid-19 include proper medical supervision, daily temperature checks and being able to manage symptoms and players.
^
"If the clubs could do that, they could operate but it's a big challenge for the women's game," she adds.

So, even if you play at the same club, girls are likely to be told to stay home whilst boys continue as normal.^

I do not understand. If you play at for QPR, at QPR, are you not already under QPR's medical supervision? How challenging can it be to take temperatures before every training session. How challenging can it be to isolate and send home any players with symptoms?

OP posts:
nosswith · 11/11/2020 19:02

The decisions on what sports, recreation and exercise to continue were made by four cabinet ministers. All men and none particularly keen on sport.

nettie434 · 11/11/2020 21:22

Casey Stoney, the manager of the Manchester United women's team, has spoken out about this. Interestingly, this article seems to imply it is the FA's decision rather than the government's. Brighton women have also just issued a statement arguing that their women's academy is just as 'elite' as the men's and so can still operate under the dispensation for elite sport.

www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/54833598

Women's football has been harder hit by the pandemic so the gap between the men and women's game will be even greater post covid (assuming we get there) than before.

HecatesCats · 11/11/2020 21:28

Discrimination, surely?

nosswith · 12/11/2020 06:17

If it is the decision of the FA then given their now former chairman and some of his views, sadly not a surprise.

Beamur · 12/11/2020 07:04

How can it be anything other than direct discrimination on the basis of sex (dressed up as lack of facilities, which in itself is discriminatory in that girls are being treated differently).
Arses.

JellySlice · 12/11/2020 12:20

It's the reasons they give that don't make sense to me.

OP posts:
ErrolTheDragon · 12/11/2020 13:16

@Beamur

How can it be anything other than direct discrimination on the basis of sex (dressed up as lack of facilities, which in itself is discriminatory in that girls are being treated differently). Arses.
Yes. It's adding insult to injury, isn't it.
New posts on this thread. Refresh page
Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is closed and is no longer accepting replies. Click here to start a new thread.