i) The press must avoid prejudicial or pejorative reference to an individual's, race, colour, religion, sex, gender identity, sexual orientation or to any physical or mental illness or disability.
ii) Details of an individual's race, colour, religion, gender identity, sexual orientation, physical or mental illness or disability must be avoided unless genuinely relevant to the story.
Hang on, why is sex missed out of the second one then? Why not just require 'Person' unless it's relevant, like everything else?
But since sex is fine to use, I still don't see the problem here, reporting a person's sex, and only report a person's gender identity if relevant is the rules here, so why aren't journalists following them? Why are they reporting gender identity, and ignoring sex in clear contravention?