@BigFatLiar
Usually if transgender men become pregnant its through choice with the intention of having a baby to raise. (Physically they're still female)
Hmm, I'm not so sure about that. I read at least two studies into females who identify as trans and who fall pregnant. Fully a third to a half of each study's subjects said their pregnancy was unplanned. The main reason was that they thought they couldn't fall pregnant and so did not use contraceptives.
I don't think we should consider this as such a rare occasion that it doesn't really warrant any special effort being spent on these females being able to access abortions. All female people need to be able to do so, however they identify. And there's nothing wrong with specifically targeting a campaign at females who identify as trans. There's everything wrong though with erasing 99% of females who need to access an abortion for the sake of being inclusive to 1%. You don't alienate the vast majority in the name of a tiny majority. That's not exactly a winning strategy when you seek to increase acceptance for the latter.
But much much worse than alienating most women on this issue through "inclusive" language that erases women is that having to carry a child to term when you don't want to is a human rights issue that only ever affects women, regardless of what courtesy title is bestowed on or used by those of us who would rather be men. We are the only class of humans who can carry a baby. And this nonsense about pregnant men leaves us in a much weaker position when fighting for our reproductive rights.