My daughter has just started secondary. She was asked to write about a famous woman from a specific country's history. At our house we have several books that might help 'Women in Science', 'Rejected Princesses' and 'Rebel Girls'. Rebel Girls is her least favourite and it came up in conversation that there is a transwoman included in Rebel Girls which I didn't know having not read the thing. My daughter questioned why a transgender boy would be included as it isn't something that a natal female can aspire to be and that actually, they should be in Rebel Boys.
This is something that I cannot get past in this argument - I literally have no understanding. Why is there such a push from some trans activists to get men who don't conform under the 'female' umbrella unless it's about dominating women rather than empowering themselves.. Surely it's far more subversive and brave to be a non-conforming male. It is male acceptance of their non-conforming gender identity and campaigning for safety within that sphere that should be the battle, not the battle to gain access to womens' spaces.
I know you know all this - I was just surprised that my 12 year old also expressed it when we hadn't really talked about it. Her school is fairly Stonewall under the banner of inclusivity and being nice.