Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

GMB Deemed “Institutionally sexist”

62 replies

CaveMum · 02/09/2020 20:06

From BBC: www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-54003606

Full text:

The GMB Union has been called "institutionally sexist" after an independent report into sexual harassment within the organisation.

The report's author, Karon Monaghan QC, said "bullying, misogyny, cronyism and sexual harassment are endemic".
And she said the union's policies were not "sufficiently clear or robust".

The organisation's national president, Barbara Plant, apologised to members who had suffered, saying "real and lasting change is needed".

The investigation into the union, the UK's third-biggest, in terms of members, was launched in May.

Publishing her findings on Wednesday, Ms Monaghan said women were "underrepresented throughout the GMB's ranks", with branches "often organised in a way that deters women members' participation".

She said regional secretaries, who oversee "good governance" in different parts of the UK, were "and always have been, men" - and held "disproportionate power" in the union.
She added: "Many use that power to bully and manipulate members of the GMB's lay bodies."

Ms Monaghan also said there was a culture of "heavy drinking and late-night socialising, salacious gossip and a lack of professionalism".
She added: "Fundamental change is required if the GMB is to meet its promise to women in the GMB and to women in society more widely."

The QC made a list of 27 recommendations to the union to tackle its failures, including taking steps to increase representation of women at all levels, a bespoke complaints procedure for sexual harassment and an annual equalities audit.

Ms Plant, who has been the GMB's national president since 2018, said the report made "sad and difficult reading".

She said: "On behalf of GMB, I apologise to all those who have experienced sexual harassment or bullying within the union.
"It's clear that real and lasting change is needed for us to become a safe and inclusive place for all."

She said the union would now act on the report's recommendations, adding: "We are committed to achieving this transformational change."

Analysis by Iain Watson, political correspondent

For an organisation which is supposed to represent staff who may be bullied or harrassed in the workplace, it is clearly embarrassing that it has not apparently put its own house in order.
The report was prompted by an anonymous letter to the union's national president Barbara Plant by "concerned members and staff" of the GMB in the spring, which had complained about the handling, or mishandling, of complaints of harassment and assault.
The union has decided to publish Karon Monaghan's findings unexpurgated - and with the forthcoming election of a new general secretary, the GMB's most senior paid official, it has the opportunity to deliver the "transformational change" that its executive committee is now promising.
The union is affiliated to Labour - and another QC, Martin Forde, is currently chairing an inquiry into the party's culture, prompted by the leaking of a report which contained hitherto confidential emails and WhatsApp messages between staff.
It remains to be seen if he will be as straight-talking as Ms Monaghan.

OP posts:
ArabellaScott · 02/09/2020 20:42

Oh gosh really who would have thought it how surprising.

ItsAllGoingToBeFine · 02/09/2020 20:46

@ArabellaScott

Oh gosh really who would have thought it how surprising.
This^
SerenityNowwwww · 02/09/2020 20:54

Haha haha ha

Ha

What a surprise.

Cabinfever10 · 02/09/2020 21:18

Business as usual then

Melroses · 02/09/2020 21:22

Is that the union that withdrew from the Mumsnet chat because they thought Mumsnetters had the wrong idea about what a woman is and couldn't possibly engage?

TweeBree · 02/09/2020 21:22

Good to see it called out for exactly what it is.

FloresTorres · 02/09/2020 21:24

Not fit for purpose.
Never was.
Male pale and stale, with a sprinkling of woke, to cling onto the yoof vote.

Whatwouldscullydo · 02/09/2020 21:24

So people who dont know what a women is, still somehow manage to treat women unfavourably...

I think thet know more than they let on

ArabellaScott · 02/09/2020 21:24

@Melroses

Is that the union that withdrew from the Mumsnet chat because they thought Mumsnetters had the wrong idea about what a woman is and couldn't possibly engage?
Yes.
FloresTorres · 02/09/2020 21:24

@Melroses

Is that the union that withdrew from the Mumsnet chat because they thought Mumsnetters had the wrong idea about what a woman is and couldn't possibly engage?
Yep!
Melroses · 02/09/2020 21:26

In that case, a lot of women on MN have had a narrow escape!

Just think how many of them could have joined, only to be discriminated against.

MilleniumHallsWalledGarden · 02/09/2020 21:32

I just can't believe it. I am so shocked.

HermioneWeasley · 02/09/2020 21:33

I’m shocked, shocked I tell ya.

CaveMum · 02/09/2020 21:35

I know, it’s a totally unexpected isn’t it.

OP posts:
yourhairiswinterfire · 02/09/2020 21:38

Is that the union that withdrew from the Mumsnet chat because they thought Mumsnetters had the wrong idea about what a woman is and couldn't possibly engage?

A union arrogant enough to think they get to tell women on a female dominated forum that they don't know what women are, treats women like shit. Colour me surprised.

It's always the most vocal, virtue signalling twatbadgers that have skeletons in the closet, isn't it?

ApplejackCriesOnTheInside · 02/09/2020 21:39

Gosh what a surprise.

Igmum · 02/09/2020 21:43

I love the word twatbadgers thanks Yourhair!

Yes, and no surprise to see yet more sexism and misogyny here

PronounssheRa · 02/09/2020 21:45

Well that's a shock 🙄

To be fair though, most unions are drenched in misogyny.

SerenityNowwwww · 02/09/2020 21:47

What’s that noise? What can I hear?

Snickering from MNHQ?

kazzer2867 · 02/09/2020 21:50

Not surprised. Was a member several years ago and used their local rep to help me with a case. He spent most of our meeting telling me how lucky my partner was to have me.

MoltenLasagne · 02/09/2020 21:51

@Whatwouldscullydo

So people who dont know what a women is, still somehow manage to treat women unfavourably...

I think thet know more than they let on

What was the quote? "143 different genders and yet we still know which half of the human race has to wipe arses"
yourhairiswinterfire · 02/09/2020 21:51

I love the word twatbadgers thanks Yourhair!

Ha, I picked it up from here Igmum, along with cockwomble.

Bad influence, this lot Wink

enjoyingscience · 02/09/2020 21:52

The union I was briefly a member of sounded great on paper, but it became quickly clear that the local branch existed solely to provide a means to prop up the gigantic egos of the committee members. They were all underwhelming white men with mediocre jobs, and I think the committee gave them a way to feel important. It was useless, and I left sharpish.

I was never sure if this was just a one off bad experience or something broader, but it sounds now like it was the latter...

PronounssheRa · 02/09/2020 21:52

Snickering from MNHQ?

Schadenfreude.

Now is a great time to remind people of GMBs refusal to give employment advice to women, at the height of a pandemic.

What a bunch of arses. Sexist arses.

Swipe left for the next trending thread