Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Pregnant people again

1 reply

Wondersense · 15/07/2020 09:41

I know this article was written in the U.S for the Guardian. I wasn't going to post about it, but one sentence really got to me. I believe it's important to name a problem. To accurately describe something, a situation. I don't like it when things are dressed up as something they aren't (which is why I dislike use of American corporate language such as describing mass redundancies as 'personal development growth opportunities' and other such nonsense).

In almost every area of life, people are undermined and exploited, then made to feel that their inability to thrive is somehow their fault. It’s not unreasonable for someone living under such conditions to decide they simply can’t provide for a new life

She talking about women in this article.

Not.
Fucking
'people'.

www.theguardian.com/us-news/2020/jul/09/childfree-society-not-built-for-motherhood

OP posts:
WomaninBoots · 15/07/2020 11:08

It's ridiculous. "People" implies all people or kind of a random selection of people to me. If she's talking about women she should name them! If transwomen are women it doesn't fucking matter does it? Removing the word women from shit shows that they KNOW transwomen are not actually women. It's infuriating.

New posts on this thread. Refresh page
Swipe left for the next trending thread