Interesting to see the reference there to Andrea Dworkin, as a recent Conversation piece claimed Dworkin was "quite emphatic about including trans women as women".
It's one of the most bizarre claims I've seen - anybody with even a cursory knowledge of Dworkin would know she relentlessly equated 'penis' and 'man' - and the 'reference' provided (by a University professor, this) is to a quote within a NYT piece where Dworkin remarks that "transvestite men" have penetrated to the core experience of the romanticised social construct of womanhood.
This is read - with deliberate naivety? - as saying "transvestite men" - specifically referred to by Dworkin as that, and as "these men" - are the ultimate women, and therefore Dworkin was "quite emphatic about including trans women as women".
This is one philosophy professor quoting another, both throwing analysis and the most basic research principles out the window.