Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

GIDS being sued by their safeguarding lead.

786 replies

ItsAllGoingToBeFine · 07/07/2020 14:54

(Text from their crowdfunder)

My Details

My name is Sonia Appleby. I am a qualified social worker (1981); adult psychoanalytic psychotherapist (I992); MSc. in health psychology, (research) and MBA. I have a long career safeguarding and protecting children in social care, health and as a children’s guardian in public and private proceedings.

I am currently the Named Professional for Safeguarding Children and the Safeguarding Children Lead at the Tavistock and Portman NHS Foundation Trust. I am therefore still employed by the Trust against which I am bringing my claim.

What is Safeguarding?

In all NHS trusts and organisations there are professionals such as myself, who work with other internal departments and external agencies to ensure there are 'root and branch' systems to keep patients and service users safe. This means responding to patient/service users' personal experiences, also including their environmental, familial, community/peer circumstances and sometimes any of the aforementioned domains could require the intervention of other professionals in different agencies. Safeguarding children and young people also concerns ensuring there is a sufficiently, healthy culture that does not unwittingly contribute to potential harm regarding the people who use and deliver NHS services.

Safeguarding within the Trust

My primary task is to ensure that clinicians protect their patients/service users from avoidable harm and are also able to recognize and appropriately respond to situations where under 18s are in need of safeguarding. My secondary task is challenge practices which are either harmful or could lead to harm. The Trust is commissioned by NHS England to deliver a National Gender Identity Development Service (GIDS), which provides services for children and adolescents diagnosed with gender dysphoria. The treatments available also include "puberty blockers".

I have sought to ensure the principle of ''safeguarding children and young people'' is upheld whilst service users are being assessed and treated within the GIDS service.

My Claim

I lodged a whistle-blowing claim in November 2019 at the Central London Employment Tribunal. Since then I have made 2 applications to amend my claim as new information came to light.

In my claim, I allege that because I made "protected disclosures" to my line manager regarding concerns raised by GIDS staff ( that the health or safety of patients was being, had been or was likely to be endangered), I was subjected to detriments.

I allege these detriments are:

i) the Tavistock misused it's own procedures to besmirch me and therefore jeopardize the role of safeguarding within the Trust;

ii) there was an unwritten but mandated directive from the Tavistock management that safeguarding concerns should not be brought to my attention despite being the Trust Safeguarding Children Lead;

iii) and, clinicians were discouraged from reporting safeguarding concerns to me.

I also allege various other detriments.

Further to disclosures made to Newsnight by former staff, BBC Newsnight produced a programme focusing on the allegation that the Trust did not want to report any concerns to me. www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-51806962

and you can watch it here

OP posts:
PaleBlueMoonlight · 27/08/2020 08:38

Done

SorryAuntLydia · 28/08/2020 14:02

Bumpity bump

fatblackcatspaw · 28/08/2020 14:16

yeah 4 days to go bumpity bump

NonnyMouse1337 · 29/08/2020 18:02
Cake
Datun · 29/08/2020 18:51

Yes, this is another vital case!

And not making as much money as it should.

EmpressJKRowlingSpartacus · 29/08/2020 22:47

This case has 4 days to go & could do with some help. You can untick a box on the payment page to avoid giving CrowdJustice a tip.

Hazeldine · 29/08/2020 23:15

Thanks for the reminder, I have donated and shared.

Failedfeminist · 29/08/2020 23:53

Donated, took me a while to find the case, searching on Sonia's name and all major terms on the CJ site didn't show the case! In the end I went from this article to Sonia's page which had a link to the case on the CJ site. I remembered to edit the CJ contribution to zero this time

EmpressJKRowlingSpartacus · 30/08/2020 11:49

Bumping again. This might well be the most important one of the lot. If GIDS were forced to introduce proper safeguarding processes it could make an enormous difference in the number of kids who get transitioned.

Datun · 30/08/2020 18:38

I'm also bumping.

I can't stress enough how important this one is. It may not have the spotlight on it like others, but that's because it's about safeguarding.

This from Sonia:

"I lodged a whistle-blowing claim in November 2019 at the Central London Employment Tribunal. Since then I have made 2 applications to amend my claim as new information came to light.

In my claim, I allege that because I made "protected disclosures" to my line manager regarding concerns raised by GIDS staff ( that the health or safety of patients was being, had been or was likely to be endangered), I was subjected to detriments.

I allege these detriments are:

i) the Tavistock misused it's own procedures to besmirch me and therefore jeopardize the role of safeguarding within the Trust;

ii) there was an unwritten but mandated directive from the Tavistock management that safeguarding concerns should not be brought to my attention despite being the Trust Safeguarding Children Lead;"

This woman has raised concerns, and been besmirched as a result.

She's been employed to do a job, and when that job gets uncomfortable for someone, she's been vilified.

What's going on? What's the problem? Why are her 'disclosures' not addressed?

Why the fuck are safeguarding concerns being kept from the safeguarding officer?

NonnyMouse1337 · 30/08/2020 18:47

Yes it's a really important case, for safeguarding as well as whistleblowing. It's vital she has the funds behind her so she can see this through in court.

StandUpStraight · 30/08/2020 18:56

Have dug again. It’s insane how many people are having to initiate court proceedings just to get people to do their jobs properly or implement existing law.

WichBitchHarpyTerfThatsMe · 30/08/2020 19:51

That's exactly it StandUpStraight, the general public having to issue multiple legal proceedings, and to pay endless fivers and tenners, to try and get organisations to correctly comply with the law. It's ridiculous.

Signalbox · 19/03/2021 11:19

Just wanted to bump this as there is an update from Sonia on her Crowdfunding page and it looks as if she is moving closer to a hearing and she is asking for support...

Update on Safeguarding Concerns at GIDS

Hello Donor Contributors

It is now approaching 6 months since my last update and some 9 months since the instigation of my CrowdJustice webpage. In the interim, there have been some very pertinent developments regarding GIDS, which are easily accessed via the internet and social media.

Notwithstanding the above developments, I would like to thank you all not only for your generous donations but also your well-observed commentaries and fortifying support. It has really helped me through this litigation process.

My case rests on being vilified for raising safeguarding concerns with my line managers about the safety of children and young people receiving GID services.

I have moved my representation from Sternberg Reed solicitors to Branch Austin LLP, although my legal team remains headed up by my solicitor, Elliot Hammer.

We are now mid-way through exchanging the evidentiary documents and agreeing the trial bundle with the solicitors for the Trust. We are also now taking the initial steps to take proofs of evidence from my witnesses. Many potential witnesses are scared of being scapegoated by their current and future employers, which I know many of you understand all too well from your direct experiences and/or from your empathetic responses.

If you have already supported me, I would be most grateful if you could circulate the link to my Crowd Justice webpage as widely as possible.

Thank you and best wishes

Sonia

NonnyMouse1337 · 19/03/2021 12:03

Really shameful that she has been vilified for adhering to safeguarding principles and raising concerns. Thanks for bumping up the thread.

AdHominemNonSequitur · 19/03/2021 12:44

Would a search on said website for Sonia Appleby, find the necessary?

JustTurtlesAllTheWayDown · 19/03/2021 12:50

I found it by googling her name and crowdfunding. Thanks for the heads up. I got my spade out. Smile

CousinKrispy · 19/03/2021 16:19

Yes, I just googled crowdjustice and her first name and it came up! Thanks for the reminder.

FindTheTruth · 19/03/2021 16:37

What's going on? What's the problem? Why are her 'disclosures' not addressed?

Why the fuck are safeguarding concerns being kept from the safeguarding officer?

Hopefully we'll get answers when the judge(s) ask these questions.

More clarity in the court of facts, evidence and law... just like ONS Census, MoJ Prisons and Keira Bell Tavistock.

and why do some MPs want to ban safeguarding by calling it 'conversion therapy'

DisappearingGirl · 19/03/2021 16:39

Thanks, I saw Sonia's update and have donated again.

I try to keep a balanced view on trans issues but if there's one thing I feel strongly about it's the medicalisation of children/teens.

gardenbird48 · 19/03/2021 16:56

thanks for the reminder - I have dug and remembered to remove the contribution for Crowdjustice for what they did to Allison Bailey.

Would I hold a grudge??

Absolutely - for as long as I live Grin

gardenbird48 · 19/03/2021 16:56

or until they apologise obvs.

Herja · 19/03/2021 17:18

Donated and bumping.

I'm another who holds a long grudge - crowdjustice haven't had a penny extra from me since their shitty behaviour around Alison Bailey.

LizzieSiddal · 19/03/2021 17:28

It’s so infuriating that we keep having to do this over and over again.

It’s such an important case though and I will donate.

DisappearingGirl · 19/03/2021 18:42

In terms of the donation to crowdjustice - I generally remove it (partly as 10% seems steep) but I try and leave it on every now and then. I get the thing about Allison, but equally, they could refuse to host any of these cases if they just get hassle for it and don't make any money from them.

And that would be a real bummer, as these grassroots cases seem to be the only way in which any of this is being challenged.

I think I have a pretty low bar for being pleased if an organisation agrees to even host or mention any of these issues!!