Meet the Other Phone. A phone that grows with your child.

Meet the Other Phone.
A phone that grows with your child.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Civitas Report: The Corrosive Impact of Transgender Ideology

39 replies

ItsAllGoingToBeFine · 19/06/2020 08:51

www.civitas.org.uk/publications/the-corrosive-impact-of-transgender-ideology/

The blurb:

In less than two decades ‘transgender’ has gone from a term representing individuals and little used outside of specialist communities, to signifying a powerful political ideology driving significant social change. At the level of the individual, this shift has occurred through the separation of gender from sex, before reclaiming biology through an innate sense of ‘gender-identity’.

In this report, Joanna Williams argues that this return to biology allows for the formation of a distinct identity group, one that can stake a claim to being persecuted, and depends upon continual validation and confirmation from an external audience. All critical discussion is a threat to this public validation and is often effectively curtailed.

This ideology has meant that in 2019, the number of 11- and 13-year-olds referred to NHS specialist medical help with transitioning rose by 28 and 30 per cent, respectively, over the previous year. The youngest patients have been just three years old. Arrests and prosecutions have been made for ‘deliberately misgendering’ through the use of male pronouns. Transgender pupils have been free to use the toilets and changing rooms that match their gender identity, previously intended only for members of the opposite sex. Reports of the attacks on women in prisons carried out by transgender inmates suggest that the feelings of transgender women are being placed above the safety of females. But why has this been allowed to happen?

Joanna Williams suggests that the move of transgenderism from niche to mainstream tells us more about the rest of society than it does about transgender individuals. People in positions of power within the realms of media, education, academia, police, social work, medicine, law, and local and national government have been prepared to coalesce behind the demands of a tiny transgender community. Previously authoritative institutions now lack confidence in their own ability to lead and look to the transgender community as a victimised group that can act as a source of moral authority. However, this, in turn, has not only eroded sex-based rights but undermined crucial areas of child protection.

OP posts:
Datun · 01/07/2020 00:43

Does anyone know who commissioned the report?

StandUpStraight · 01/07/2020 06:42

Picked up by The Telegraph last night and on their page this morning: www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2020/06/30/niche-transgender-ideology-corrosive-society-says-report/
They don’t do share tokens but here’s first couple of paragraphs:

“Transgender ideology is leaving a “corrosive impact" on society, according to a new study calling for the scrapping of gender recognition reforms.

The report by the Civitas think tank accuses public institutions of being captivated by an "ideology of transgenderism" that is unable to defend the sex-based rights of women.“

The article mentions JKR and @Glinner and would be pretty eye opening reading for anyone new to the topic - it’s short but it covers what is happening to children, and the link between transgenderism and the institutional regulation of speech and behaviour. No weasel words that I can see (this early in the morning).

Longtalljosie · 01/07/2020 06:48

Civitas is known to be a pretty right-wing think tank. It would be surprising if its views were different to this.

Longtalljosie · 01/07/2020 06:50

Sorry I sounded a bit dismissive- dreadful nights sleep! Just counselling it’s not a shift for them. Unsurprising the Telegraph has picked it up - this is their favourite think tank.

StandUpStraight · 01/07/2020 06:59

It’s an interesting juxtaposition to the hatchet job they did on Glinner yesterday. They even used the same photo of him in the article.

endofthelinefinally · 01/07/2020 07:51

Is Joanna Williams considered to be right wing?

SirSamuelVimesBlackboardMonito · 01/07/2020 08:03

I have a Tory MP who's voting record suggests he's to the right of the party. I will be sending him the report and the link to the telegraph article. If it's a think tank he would normally listen to / agree with it could be very a powerful tool.

The people in power are the people that matter here. We've probably got ten years of Tory rule ahead of us; the gains Starmer would need in order to create a labour win at the next election is just not credible. We need to work with what we have in government.

Abitofalark · 01/07/2020 12:32

It wasn't commissioned, if you mean by some external party. Joanna Williams is Director of Civitas's Freedom, Democracy and Victimhood project. Before that, she was an academic and is a regular writer on Spiked online, writing mainly about education. Her academic subject was Higher Education.

Sexnotgender · 01/07/2020 12:35

@Thinkingabout1t

You can buy the paper book through Amazon! via the Civitas site: www.civitas.org.uk/

but I never use Amazon so I was pleased to get the download. Would have bought the book otherwise. (I’ll buy from Amazon when they start paying proper tax, and stop undermining bookshops, which probably = never.)

Leaving it around should spark some interesting debates!

And stop promoting mermaids 😏
endofthelinefinally · 01/07/2020 12:55

You can buy it direct from Civitas. I would rather do that than support Amazon tbh.

Datun · 01/07/2020 13:09

@Abitofalark

It wasn't commissioned, if you mean by some external party. Joanna Williams is Director of Civitas's Freedom, Democracy and Victimhood project. Before that, she was an academic and is a regular writer on Spiked online, writing mainly about education. Her academic subject was Higher Education.
Ok thank you. So it's funded by donations?

It doesn't get paid for these reports?

Abitofalark · 01/07/2020 13:38

Datun, Civitas's web site has a section about how it is funded:

In part: "Our policy is to encourage donations from a wide variety of sources so that we are not unduly reliant on any one donor. So that authors can write without fear or favour, our publications are not sponsored. Many companies and charitable foundations like to focus their charitable giving on a specific project, such as a Saturday school, and so we do allow organisations to sponsor our supplementary schools. Philanthropic support for the education of children who are falling behind at school does not involve a potential conflict of interest.

We publish the names of donors who, on request, are willing to be identified. However, we respect the privacy of donors when they have a legal right to make charitable donations without being publicly identified. While transparency is an important value, there are also good reasons why some foundations and individuals prefer not to be identified. This might include modesty, personal security, or a desire to avoid being aggressively targeted for donations by other organisations. "
civitas.org.uk/about-us/

Datun · 01/07/2020 14:14

[quote Abitofalark]Datun, Civitas's web site has a section about how it is funded:

In part: "Our policy is to encourage donations from a wide variety of sources so that we are not unduly reliant on any one donor. So that authors can write without fear or favour, our publications are not sponsored. Many companies and charitable foundations like to focus their charitable giving on a specific project, such as a Saturday school, and so we do allow organisations to sponsor our supplementary schools. Philanthropic support for the education of children who are falling behind at school does not involve a potential conflict of interest.

We publish the names of donors who, on request, are willing to be identified. However, we respect the privacy of donors when they have a legal right to make charitable donations without being publicly identified. While transparency is an important value, there are also good reasons why some foundations and individuals prefer not to be identified. This might include modesty, personal security, or a desire to avoid being aggressively targeted for donations by other organisations. "
civitas.org.uk/about-us/[/quote]
Thank you!

I did have a read I didn't see that bit Blush.

Abitofalark · 01/07/2020 14:27

To be fair, it's not well signposted. You have to scroll a long way, past other headings, to find it.

New posts on this thread. Refresh page