Hayden v The Spectator

[MrsSnippyPants]

Decision: No breach - after investigation

Apologies if already posted, I hadn't seen it here and wondered if I had missed it

www.ipso.co.uk/rulings-and-resolution-statements/ruling/?id=00857-20

Great news. I hadn't seen this before either

I love this part of the finding, the publication was entitled to publish the writer’s opinion that the conviction was unfair and had the effect of chilling freedom of speech.

Hayden doesn't want public comments made about their case unless they are pro Hayden.

Even more chilling than the case itself.

Good news I hadn't seen it so thanks for posting

Excellent news. So that's the mail on Sunday and the spectator?

Good. Another substance-free complaint brushed aside. Hope we see more of this.

The bullying doesn't seem to be working anymore. They'll just have to revert to tantrums.

Oh no. Poor them.

Hayden really is their own worst enemy.

Sometimes all you have to do is take a step back and let things play out, so everyone can see the patterns of behaviour for themselves. Or at least until they can no longer ignore them.

The difficulty is that for a publication like the Spectator, dealing with a complaint takes up time and resource. So even if the ruling goes in their favour (which Hayden probably knew it would), it might make them less inclined to publish articles on Hayden or the trans issue more generally. I don't think it will, because the Spectator have been pretty robust so far, but I'm sure that must be the aim.

If that's the aim I think Hayden has seriously miscalculated how bloody minded certain papers are. If anything it might make The Spectator more likely to publish those stories.

Excellent news. Hayden really isn't doing themself any favours. The last case drew attention to Hayden's criminal record and now this.

It did prawn. 🕷

Shame. Perhaps Hayden might want to.put their case on the BBC Big Questions. Except they can't. They wouldn't deal with them either. Kindov what happens when you have an extensive, documented, criminal past.

Ha ha ha ha ha ha.
Steph Stuffed.
Shock Horror.
What larks!

Oh good.

Excellent news.

They don't like it up 'em!

Happy Friday, everyone!

Oh good, more sunlight.

Oh dear. What a shame ☺️

This person has dedicated their life to forcing others to waste huge amounts of time, money and energy, for no good reason.

The amount of time wasted by police, courts, judges, etc on just one person who has never once won a single lawsuit brought against anyone (afaik) beggars belief.

This isn't just misogyny; it seems to be a burning hatred for all of humanity. I wonder where that stems from.

Who funds all this?

The funds from the previous case being settled, I'd imagine.

@black

you should report your post quickly, or you may get a strike for mis gendering