Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions
Justhadathought · 14/03/2020 09:19

Given there is no such thing as a share token for The Spectator - I'll cut and paste a few sections:

^A few years later I wrote about Claudia’s brave stance in supporting complainants against a psychiatrist who took just 45 minutes to diagnose her as suffering from ‘gender dysphoria’ back in 1986. Due to this diagnosis, Claudia was given irreversible cross-sex hormones aged 26 and had full sex change surgery two years later.

When it became public that Claudia was a ‘regretter’ she was bullied, vilified and ostracised by her so called ‘community’. I witnessed it. This radical feminist who did not believe that people were ‘trapped in the wrong body’ and the transsexual woman, a camp, larger-than-life person who once described the love of her life as looking like a cross between George Best and Jesus Christ, found common ground^

OP posts:
Justhadathought · 14/03/2020 09:21

"Today, Claudia ‘cannot understand why the Scottish Government entertains this absurd, dangerous and divisive idea of self-ID... Those who self-ID desperately wish to access women’s spaces, which makes it dangerous for those women and girls. That’s a fact.’

Although Claudia and I do not necessarily agree on everything to do with trans rights and ‘what makes a woman’ we are both deeply uncomfortable with a proposal that would give natal males the right to decide they are female.

‘I was deeply shocked to find that the 2018 consultation had only 15,500 responses, and yet the government was all set to push through ID based on such a tiny percentage of the nation.' A change to self-ID 'would bring about such radical change that affects women, children and trans women like myself,’ she says"

OP posts:
Justhadathought · 14/03/2020 09:22

"Claudia has a fascinating story to tell about her life, both before and after transition, but has been censored and shut down from doing so. Having secured both an agent and a publishing deal for a book, Claudia then found herself on the same side of those of us that have been silenced and de-platformed.

‘Trans activists successfully managed to rob me of my publishing deal,’ says Claudia. ‘My autobiography was accepted by a reputable book agent, signed and sealed but never delivered. Why were they so afraid of a trans woman writing the truth of living this existence?"

OP posts:
Justhadathought · 14/03/2020 09:23

"For Claudia, to be at odds with the trans community is as painful as it is incomprehensible, but she refuses to shy away from the fact that the extreme trans activists could risk destroying fundamental rights.

‘I blame this toxic row over self-ID for the scrutiny which we are now under,’ she says. ‘Because men who do not pass and have not had the surgery or hormones are demanding access to women-only spaces, we are all under scrutiny and our rights are in danger of disappearing.’

For example what would happen if she became ill? ‘I would rather die on the street than be in a male ward,’ says Claudia. ‘For someone like me living in the opposite gender role for almost 40 years, suddenly to have the rights I have taken from me is calamitous."

OP posts:
Justhadathought · 14/03/2020 09:23

"Claudia’s final word is about young trans-identifying people.

‘The numbers detransitioning shows that this simply must stop. The outward journey is mind bending, the return journey must be even worse,’ she says. ‘I see a generation of very damaged young people, their bodies and minds ruined. Because of the puberty blockers and opposite-sex hormones, those who wish to return to their former selves, never will. Their original selves are lost. I know this from my own life. I lost myself"

OP posts:
OhHolyJesus · 14/03/2020 09:55

Thanks for posting this OP. I'm sure Claudia and I wouldn't agree on many things either but it's interesting to read and hear that Claudia doesn't support GRA reform.

Justhadathought · 14/03/2020 10:00

It does seem that Claudia has become a victim in her own life for various reasons: to do with too easy a diagnosis in the first place, and then through the realisation that surgery was not the magic bullet that was promised. But once you've been through all of that surgery and treatment there is no going back. it must be hellish.

OP posts:
rogdmum · 14/03/2020 10:04

Claudia is absolutely lovely- I follow her on Twitter and she just doesn’t stop about her concern re what’s happening with children/adolescents.

testing987654321 · 14/03/2020 10:18

There is this article from 13 years ago.

I know some people think it's just a courtesy but I find the use of "she" throughout the article really insulting. It tricks your brain into thinking this all happened to a young woman, but it didn't it's entirely a man's (horrible) experience. It's like saying "when she won the gold medal" about Caitlyn Jenner. It makes no sense.

R0wantrees · 14/03/2020 11:12

Extract from the linked Sunday Telegraph Magazine article by Julie Bindel
15 November 2003

‘I changed for all the wrong reasons, and then it was too late,’ says Claudia. ‘I was seen for 45 minutes by a psychiatrist in private practice, and I believe I was railroaded into thinking that an irreversible operation was the only solution. It made me feel they were just in it for my money.’ Claudia is currently unable to work due to depression, caused by the operation: ‘I feel like this sex change has just made me into some kind of freak.’

Dr Fiona Mason, a forensic psychiatrist with an expertise in gender issues, is seriously concerned about the practices of some private clinics dealing with transsexualism. ‘I can’t imagine assessing anyone suffering from a serious disorder in under three hours. It can take three years to assess patients with complex problems. The trouble with some private clinics is that the patients are just given hormones after an hour-long appointment, which can have an irreversible effect on the body.’

Some critics are even going as far as to say that psychiatrists have not, in fact, ‘discovered’ transsexuals but created them. That is, that once ‘transsexual’ and ‘gender-identity disorder’ (GID) became common currency more people began interpreting their experience in these terms. Specialists working in gender-identity clinics made similar complaints about their patients as early as the mid-1970s. Patients were learning the symptoms of gender dysphoria and repeating them to clinicians in order to become candidates for sex-reassignment surgery. Sandra, a 25-year-old bus driver, changed sex four years ago. She is 6ft tall, with a low-cut blouse exposing her ample cleavage, and bright red hair framing a masculine face. ‘I easily learnt what I needed to say to doctors in order to get surgery, and I know other transsexuals do the same. I felt they couldn’t wait to get hold of my money. They would have diagnosed a German Shepherd as transsexual if it had enough money for the consultation.’

Today the best-known psychiatrist dealing with transsexualism is Dr Russell Reid, who runs a private practice as well as working in the NHS. In 2000 Reid was involved in controversy over the condition known as Body Dysmorphic Disorder (BDD), where sufferers can experience a desperate urge to rid themselves of a limb. Reid was one of the psychiatrists who referred two patients with BDD to a surgeon for leg amputations. ‘When I first heard of people wanting amputations it seemed bizarre in the extreme,’ he said in a television documentary at the time, ‘but then I thought, "I see transsexuals and they want healthy parts of their body removed in order to adjust to their idealised body image," and so I think that was the connection for me. I saw that people wanted to have their limbs off with equally as much degree of obsession and need.’

But to what degree should doctors be acquiescent to the ‘obsessions’ and ‘needs’ of patients; should there be a point at which they are duty-bound to say no? I asked Dr Reid how he decides on the suitability of surgery for a GID sufferer. ‘The patient makes their own diagnosis, and I confirm or refute it. If I am happy that they are serious about considering surgery in the future, I will prescribe hormones and expect them to live as a woman (or a man, if it is a female-to-male patient) for at least a year. If, after that time, they are mentally stable, living a reasonable and public life and functioning as a whole human being, and if the hormones have been effective, I would consider them worthy of surgery." (continues)
archive.li/1bcWN#selection-217.0-6.3

NonnyMouse1337 · 14/03/2020 12:50

But if 'they are mentally stable, living a reasonable and public life and functioning as a whole human being, and if the hormones have been effective' why do they need irreversible surgery then? Confused

New posts on this thread. Refresh page