I gave birth in France and got 15 sessions with a women's health physio as standard (could have had more if needed) then 15 for abdominal retraining, again, as standard and more could be had if the physio (or midwife for first 15 as midwives can offer that postnatally).
My French MIL was shocked that we considered urinary incontinence to be an inevitable consequence of birth.
My French FIL had prostate cancer and was also referred to a pelvic floor physio as a standard part of his recovery.
Interesting to know that Tena has its fingers in the NHS. I can't remember the details right now, but I read about it a good five years ago and was appalled.
Incontinence is a very lucrative business.
And one reason seeing a physio who works with pelvic floors is worth its weight in gold is because you can find out if:
a) you're not doing kegels correctly
b) that kegels aren't the saviour we've been led to believe they are
c) if you problem isn't that your pelvic floor is too loose but can't work properly because it's too tight (stressed,under too much tension)
d) can help with certain lower back pain that appears untreatable
e) better functioning pelvic floor muscles = better sex 
The French have been doing it for decades, I think the Belgians and Dutch also have it as normal, but not blanket applied to every single woman, more if they need/ask for it. It definitely can be helped in a great many women and isn't.
And it is a feminist issue because it limits how mothers interact with their kids. Pelvic floor physio can halt smaller prolapses. These are women's health issues. And since when have women's health issues not been a feminist issue?